case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-07-02 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2008 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2008 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #287.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
elialshadowpine: ([grey's anatomy] callie and arizona)

[personal profile] elialshadowpine 2012-07-03 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
Thiiiis.

I mean, speaking as a pan person, I'm pretty annoyed when "does not follow traditional gender roles = AUTOMATIC LESBIAN", because that's not the case for everyone and I really think it's harmful to actual GBL people. I know SO many lesbians who get coded as straight because their clothing choices and other things that are obvious fall in line with common feminine gender roles. (I deal with this myself to some degree because I have a male-bodied partner and like pretty skirts and stuff -- although part of that is simply that I have trouble finding pants that don't have stupidly tight waistbands, even the elastic ones, and that triggers the pain in my lower spine. I mean, granted, the moment I mention my girlfriend or ex-girlfriends, people get the message, but it doesn't help for people who don't have a chance to interact with me in depth.)

But I'm not really fond of stereotypes in general, and ideally I would love to see all types of women shown. There is a real problem with women in fiction being depicted as the more "masculine" female character being portrayed as "this is the way strong women should be" to the detriment of women who don't fall into that category, who often get derided for their femininity by the lead female character. It's like, if you're not "one of the boys", you don't count. (This is more of a problem in adult fiction, I think; it's part of why I have been reading YA a lot, because there seems to be more variance in female characters, although it still is a problem there. Just not quite prevalent to the point that I can guess within a couple pages that there is going to be animosity between the female characters.)

I am really pissed off at the straight women who are acting like the thought of people assuming they might be a lesbian is the most offensive thing evar. I'm not going to say I've never seen that assumption made, but it's nowhere near as common as they seem to think they are. And even if someone DID make that assumption, GET OVER IT. Argh.
cloudsinvenice: "everyone's mental health is a bit shit right now, so be gentle" (Default)

[personal profile] cloudsinvenice 2012-07-03 11:07 am (UTC)(link)
But I'm not really fond of stereotypes in general, and ideally I would love to see all types of women shown. There is a real problem with women in fiction being depicted as the more "masculine" female character being portrayed as "this is the way strong women should be" to the detriment of women who don't fall into that category, who often get derided for their femininity by the lead female character.

And I think the relative scarcity of female character-focused movies like this means that they have a lot of expectation on them to be all things to all viewers - like, we really need adventurous, tough, go-getting heroic women, so a protagonist needs to be that. And yet, we also need to affirm that being a "girlie" girl has positive qualities, so a nurturing/tender/empathic character is also needed. And we need to both love and hate any female character who is sharp-tongued and reckless with others' emotions - all at the same time. It's like whenever a female-centric story comes along we're all crossing our fingers for different outcomes and get really invested in them because we're worried it'll be a while before another film so thoroughly showcases a female character without shoehorning men in...