Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-10 06:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2016 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2016 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #288.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)You are an idiot. Shut up about things until you've passed the age of twenty five and stop telling WOMEN IN THE MILITARY how their pov aren't valid because oh noes they don't blindly like a badly genderswaped character that you are stanning because she has girl parts.
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I hate women in the military! Also, I love all female characters only because they are women! That's why I support Joan Watson! Not because I support an attempt to give a woman a role that they have been traditionally excluded from! And certainly not because I think more visibility in media for women of color is a good thing!
How did you find me out?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
in a completely different post even
Are you posting after taking your Ambien again??
no subject
Though I think original anon was being pretty unfair to fauxkaren to begin with.
no subject
i d t s
also I'm not arguing about this here BECAUSE IT WAS YESTERDAY, THE POST IS STILL THERE TO ARGUE IN, but I have to laugh at anyone who thinks that Watson's military service is ~A CRUCIAL PART OF THE CHARACTER~ There were like one or two throwaway mentions of it in the original ACD novels and it had zero to do with Watson as a character in any way. It's just been played up in recent adaptations -- especially, and suspiciously, the BBC one -- because it is cool and gives woobie Watson a chance to experience PTSD.
"Sherlock Holmes experts" around here sure do have a very selective memory that seems to skip right over anything that isn't Cumberbatch and that other guy :333
Anyway, the furious tears are delicious, simply delicious, and I welcome them for years to come. and in before locked.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-11 02:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-12 07:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-11 03:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-11 12:01 am (UTC)(link)I mean would you like me to say shit like "Hey you posting without taking your meds again?"
no subject
LMAO have you ever taken Ambien? Us merry band of brothers often lament how we end up browsing on it because of the posts that result. Calm yourself.
Maybe you need to TAKE YOUR KLONOPIN
*POKES THE WASP NEST, POKES IT*
(no subject)
no subject
Not to say that you don't have the objection to it for that reason, but most of the vitriol I've seen is based on the fact that Lucy Liu somehow removes the gay from Sherlock/Watson and oh god a woman, let alone a POC woman getting in the way of our queer baiting programming!
I'm waiting to see how the lack of military history plays out. It'd have been nice to see an example of a WOC solider on the television and I am curious as to why they felt to make the switch, but I'm not going to cast it out completely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-11 02:07 am (UTC)(link)The thing you have to remember is that for some of us we aren't just comparing this to Sherlock. We're comparing this to all the different Holmes adaptions and going "but why is the military background suddenly gone when its a woman Watson?"
And maybe you need to hang out in different places? Because most of objections I've seen and heard have been about them radically changing Watson's history in a way that's sort of insulting. The only time I see the "But ewww a girl" stuff is from people defending Elementary.
no subject
no subject
I think it's hard on both sides of people that are reasonable to continue to recognize reasonable arguments when they're bombarded with ridculous ones.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Depressing, though, that I thought it could have been real, don't you think? :(
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)We all need to get away.
There's one place that's on your way!
Have you had your break today?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-10 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)Also, grudge much?
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-11 12:42 am (UTC)(link)Fight about your other fandom in a thread dedicated to it, if you must. Sheesh.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-12 07:29 am (UTC)(link)not until you stop being ageist and stop telling WOMEN IN GENERAL that their opinions are wrong because you say so.