[ SECRET POST #2031 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2031 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #290.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Actually, you'd most likely get prosecuted for that here in the States, too. The usual rule is that you have a right to use deadly force to defend yourself or others, if you're under attack. But you don't have a right to use deadly force to defend property. If burglars are running out of my house with my stuff, I can't shoot them to stop them and get it back.

If they come into my house and attack me, or members of my family, that's different. Is it really the rule where you are that you have to let an intruder in your home kill you rather than risk his life by fighting back?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

(I was waiting to see if OP answered, but I don't want to leave you hanging either... OP, correct me if I'm wrong!)

No, it's not a rule. If you're physically threatened, you can fight back. If your property is threatened, you can't use deadly force. Then again, in Western Europe, it is very rare to have a gun at home, and even rarer to use it. Practically everyone I know has never seen a gun up close, much less fired one. Vigilantism is really not deeply rooted in the society I live in.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm American, and the only time I've ever seen a gun was when one of my housemates was a policeman. The US really doesn't have a gun in every household, and I would say most people I know have never seen a gun up close.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, this is what most non-Americans don't understand; they think that a statistic like "Americans own thirteen guns for every man, woman and child in the country" means "every man, woman and child in the States owns thirteen guns." They don't get that there's a HUGE number of Americans who never have and never will own guns and then a much smaller number who drive the average WAY up by collecting guns like we collect JPEGs in fap folders.