[ SECRET POST #208 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #208 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #030.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat, [ 1 ] personal attack, [ 1 ] wtf?
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, August 2nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

#4

[katsu]

I don't have a problem with Narnia being criticized. But I think there's a difference between criticism and Pullman grinding his "I hate religion" axe under the guise of criticism. Especially since in the grand scheme of pushing a religious viewpoint via literature, he's certainly not any rosier than Lewis.

Oh man. Yeah, and the Daily Mail thing was crazy and uncalled for. I may have my little issues with Pullman, but goodness that crap they said about him was off the deep end.

Re: #4

[viorica.livejournal.com]

Personally I don't find him grinding axes with his crits, but I haven't looked out everything he said so maybe somewhere he went off on one and started pouting and stamping his big secular boots. His atheist/agnostic perspective's going to colour his crits, but I figure that no reviewer's going to be free of bias so he can keep right on being the Mail's go-to guy/dangerous author for atheism and Narnia-hating.