Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-08-22 06:30 pm
[ SECRET POST #2059 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2059 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #294.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
For whatever it may be worth to you, I don't think that having a low libido is uncommon at all. And yeah, I know asexuality means no libido at all (unless we're getting into "gray-a" and "demi" which I really can't speak to.) But I say low libido isn't rare because, well, I think none is rarer and probably pretty rare, but it's just the end of a continuum.
All I mean is that, well, anyone who's at the end of a continuum is at an extreme. And I think knowing you're somewhere in the middle can be easy, but knowing for sure that you're the extreme is harder.
I think that young people have a tendency to apply labels to themselves in a very binary way, and I think that can mean doing a number on themselves. Sometimes it applies, and they're sure anyway. Sometimes, though, I think it's a part of youth to see things without a fine grain yet, and that's why I worry when I see young people getting so deeply invested in identity politics.
Particularly because asexuality is defining yourself by something you don't like, rather than something you do. If I say "I'm gay," that may imply I'm not straight, but it also implies there's something I like. If I say "I'm straight" that implies not just "I don't like people of the same gender sexually" but that I do like people of the opposite. Where with asexuality, you're defining yourself only by a never and a no.
I'm not saying that's not legitimate. I'm just saying that I think a lot of people discover that their nevers melt.
I don't think it's mentally ill for someone to say never to something (unless it's something like "I will never eat" or some other self-destructive thing.) I just think defining oneself through a never is tricky.
I think that's where some people get the feeling that asexuality is just people wanting an identity. Because I think it's pretty rare for people to define themselves by nevers, and that often when they do there's something weird about that.
Like "childfree" -- I don't think it's not a thing. I don't want a kid. But when I tried to act like this was some big part of who I was, I ended up focusing on how pure I was in not doing something, rather than focusing on the life I wanted to have. I ended up judging people who do that thing and feeling like they were somehow threatening, rather than how I feel now which is "hey, that's no one's business. Let's go plant trees or something."
I don't think that's necessarily true of asexuals and I certainly am not saying that's true of you. But I think that's where some of the hostility and confusion comes from.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-23 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)It means having no sexual attraction.
That's it.
That's why some asexuals masturbate or don't really mind sex, though they really aren't fully into it.
Maybe you should check the definition before talking about it? It seems only fair.
no subject
Specifically, this part: "And yeah, I know asexuality means no libido at all (unless we're getting into "gray-a" and "demi" which I really can't speak to.) But I say low libido isn't rare because, well, I think none is rarer and probably pretty rare, but it's just the end of a continuum."
Thank you.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-23 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)From a blog:
""It doesn’t matter, because the definition of asexual that we are using isn’t really “not sexual,” it’s “lacking sexual attraction” specifically. ""
Not talking about demis or Grey-a's since those ALSO deal with sexual attraction. Not libido. They aren't the same thing.
no subject
But... and I mean this as asking for information, not as further snark... what difference does that difference make? I'm not sure I understand.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 12:24 am (UTC)(link)Libido...not really. It just happens. It's hormones. Like sometimes I get an odd randy feeling. Has nothing to do with actual people and can be taken care of without actually thinking of other people.
I hope that might be clearer?
no subject
What you're describing -- seeing someone and wanting to have sex with them -- is something I've only experienced rarely, if at all. Usually there's also something about the person that I like, even if it's just hearing that they share an interest I like or like an activity I enjoy.
(This is probably why I'm usually utterly stumped by people's attractions to/crushes on celebrities. There's nothing about them to like! (Unless you've studied them enough to know about them, I mean.))
But I absolutely wouldn't say I'm asexual. Sex is something I like and want and need, and enjoy with people I'm dating, and wouldn't completely rule out with someone I'm not though I'd never expect that to be something I'd do.
So I'm not sure what either "asexual" or "sexual" would mean based on that definition, really. Where if "asexual" means "isn't interested in sex," that does make sense to me -- it's someone who doesn't like or usually want or much care about something I like.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Of course, I could be wrong about sexual attraction, I've never really felt anything sexual towards anything so I was mostly going by other's definitions of what sexual attraction was.
no subject
I'll admit to getting really confused when people start talking "demi" and "gray-a" though.
(NOTA BENE: I am not claiming these things, or the people they describe, do not exist or are not "real.")
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 01:05 am (UTC)(link)Grey-A is more difficult because it's basically the spectrum between asexuality and sexuality. I think it's usually either a)people who enjoy and want sex, but only under very specific circumstances
or/and b)have the desire to have sex but not strongly enough to want to actually do it.
You;d have to probably look up some Grey-A's or demis to find out more, since I am not one and only know what I've heard in the community.