[ SECRET POST #2066 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2066 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #295.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "Masterpieces"... that are overrated.

[(Anonymous)]

2001: A Space Odyssey. The movie, not the book (which I haven't read). It was SOOOO BOOOOORING, I think I fell asleep, and the only part I remember is the bit at the beginning with the black thing and the apes. Which was better when the Simpsons did it.

Is the book actually good and just one of those things that doesn't translate well to film, or is it boring too?

Re: "Masterpieces"... that are overrated.

[spicandspan89.livejournal.com]

THIS. Admittedly I was 10 when I saw it, but I have absolutely no desire to rewatch it. Apparently it's better if you consider it ~art instead of a movie... IDK.

Re: "Masterpieces"... that are overrated.

[ryttu3k]

I quite like the book (more than the movie, at any rate, which took sooooo loooong to do anythiiiiing!), but it depends on the type of sci fi you read. It does go in to a lot of detail (it's hard sci fi for a reason!), but the pace feels a bit quicker, I feel.

It really is a YMMV thing, but I'd rather reread the book than rewatch the movie.

Re: "Masterpieces"... that are overrated.

[(Anonymous)]

I like the book too. I just don't think it adapts well into a movie. There's just so much detail that you can't show.

It's kinda why I'm wary about the Foundation movie rumor. Asimov's robot movies never did super well in the first place but like half of Foundation is just two or three characters talking. What they're talking about is interesting to read but reading/seeing/light is faster than hearing/sound and I can't see it make a good movie.

Re: "Masterpieces"... that are overrated.

[ryttu3k]

That could be iffy, yeah - I haven't read Foundation (bad sci fi fan!), but I have heard it's pretty verbose.