Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-06 07:10 pm
[ SECRET POST #2074 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2074 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

[Sam Winchester, Young Hercules]
__________________________________________________
16.

[La Pucelle: Tactics]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Important: I'm really sorry about this, but I accidentally misclicked and deleted the submission post from last week instead of saving it. Managed to save the first page (25) of secrets, but the rest (about 100 or so) are gone.
If you submitted something last week (Aug 26-Sept 1), please resubmit it here.
The submissions post for next week is below as usual.
Secrets Left to Post: ?? pages, ??? secrets from Secret Submission Post #296.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-07 01:59 am (UTC)(link)You can't just ignore it, because there will be people who insist on responding to you as if you're not a real person now, as if the stuff you do belongs to the public trust, as if your reputation means your feelings no longer matter, and most annoyingly, as if everything you say is the equivalent of the Pope speaking ex cathedra and therefore if you are Wrong on the Internet you must be dogpiled For Justice.
Just keep in mind that some people *will* treat you like the Pope speaking ex cathedra, and learn to be a little more careful about what you do in public - not just because of the possible consequences, but because your reputation gives your words extra weight, and do you need to take responsibility for that. If goes very far, you might have to learn to keep your personal relationships more separate from your public fandom face, but generally it doesn't go that far.
But it's not that terrible (except during the dogpiles obvs) and like I said, most people who are reasonably competent and active and hang around fandom long enough get that label hung on them *eventually*, whether they actually rate as BNFs or not.
(says anon who just experienced for the first time someone at a RL meet-up being too scared to talk to them after learning their screenname.)
no subject
All the negative stuff you mention has never happened to me, so either i'm right and i've never been a BNF, or your experience with it is really different than my (supposed) experience.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-07 04:37 am (UTC)(link)The dogpiling probably depends a lot on exactly where you are in fandom and what kind of stuff you do, though; some bits of fandom are saner than others, and some people are naturally better at not doing stuff that causes it.
no subject
...I get an influx of commenters who have decided I am for some reason and I have to kind of retreat into a shell until they get bored and stop paying attention to me again.
Okay, but...what does that mean? Do you mean you suddenly get a lot more comments on your posts/fic/whathaveyou? Or do you mean suddenly you have a ton of people going 'omg, you're so awesome/smart/funny/awesome, can i friend?!!!!'
I've had a handful of stories that were/are *very* popular and get rec'd a lot, but to me that doesn't make you a BNF, just a good writer. I guess i think of a BNF as someone who is more active in the 'politics' of fandom, or the opinions and such of fandom. I dunno.
I do know i've mostly avoided/been completely oblivious to a lot of the wank that's gone on in my main fandoms. Yay. :)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-07 05:17 am (UTC)(link)In my experience, except in a few very special cases, BNF is not something you are, it's something people do to you.
But I'm probably a lot more active in the politics side than you are, most of my really popular stuff has been meta, although I do generally stay as far as possible out of the personality fights. People who get known almost entirely for fic/art probably get less of that drama unless they're really unlucky.
no subject
People really come to your journal to whine that your fic is overrated? What the....?
Yeah, that's just never happened to me, yay! I've had my 'time in the sun', so to speak, when i was posting a couple stories that got really popular, and that was a lot of fun, but mostly i just like being able to share the squee.
I hate personality fights. I detest wank. I really am here just for the pretty, the porn, the angst, the fluff. THIS IS NOT REAL LIFE. Real life is what i put on hold so i can hang out here.
I do love well-constructed meta, though i suppose people can pretty polarized about stuff.