Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-03 02:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #2132 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2132 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #305.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)That ending totally sold your argument.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)YOUR EROTICA IS JUST PORN. AND THAT'S JUST FINE SNOWFLAKE.
Sweet frosted baby cheesus you don't need a grand justification for liking one kind of porn over the other. So.
Re: YOUR EROTICA IS JUST PORN. AND THAT'S JUST FINE SNOWFLAKE.
That sounds yummy. Sweet-cheesy goodness.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)And that's due to the gender, not the genitals, because M/M/M when it's just porn and not a romantic relationship is super-hot and delicious for me, especially when it's two guys who are focused mainly on the third guy in the middle.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-04 02:03 am (UTC)(link)I think this is less about the actual M/M/M and more about the way it tends to get written. I slash and femmeslash almost exclusively but there's a point when all the guys are paired up with all the other guys and it starts giving off "only dudes can love and appreciate one other this well because they're guys" with sometimes added "and the women are bitches".
I read a little bit of MMF which I would distinguish from MFM, because MFM always seems to play out like a slash fangirl's ultimate fantasy, whereas the other has a bit more porn-y balance.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)Also, if you read above you'd have seen that I got the NO F/F/F from mixing OP up with a random comment.
no subject
Alright, you're just trolling. Have fun.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-03 23:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-04 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Is there a subset of slash shippers who are just cock-happy misogynists? Sure. But (and I mean hasn't this been rehashed a million times?) NOT ALL OF THEM.
Besides, the logic kind of fails. If the shipper in question is all PEEN PEEN PEEN, why would the addition of a third penis be problematic for them?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-04 00:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-04 03:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-04 00:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-04 01:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-04 03:16 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-04 03:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
beginning with why any of us slash in the first place.
Nah, let's just go with this is stupid, and you are stupid.