[ SECRET POST #2148 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Christian Free speach VS Atheist free speach-Both lost

[(Anonymous)]

I'm going to have to agree with you. I'm not a fan of religious or political displays on public property because it is just that: public. Not everyone has the same beliefs, and by putting up said display, one is either ignoring other people's beliefs and/or insinuating that one belief system is superior to another. Not allowing any displays like the nativity scene in the article to be set up in the park at all allows the public land to be neutral ground, which is exactly what it should be, in my opinion. Private land, on the other hand, is entirely different. Setting up a nativity display or a political sign on one's private property doesn't bother me in the slightest unless what it has to say is actively harmful to someone else.

Re: Christian Free speach VS Atheist free speach-Both lost

[(Anonymous)]

what's the problem with implying one religion is superior? i get that it's an asshole thing to do but why should the courts be dictating whether or not something should be allowed based on how "nice" it is? there are far worse things people are implying or outright stating that are entirely protected by law.

Re: Christian Free speach VS Atheist free speach-Both lost

[(Anonymous)]

... Because the government/courts have absolutely no place to be putting value judgements on various religions? Separation of church and state?

Re: Christian Free speach VS Atheist free speach-Both lost

[(Anonymous)]

You'd have to take that one up with the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and, like, John Marshall as to why it's the Court's job to dictate whether something should be allowed based on its constitutionality.

Incidentally, in the words of Supreme Court Justice David Souter: "government should not prefer one religion to another, or religion to irreligion." (Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, 1994).