Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-21 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #2150 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2150 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 02:42 am (UTC)(link)But it's still sexist, because the entire reason it's an insult is because it's comparing someone to a female dog (and also because it's frequently used against women who are 'too aggressive' - ie not deferential or submissive enough towad men - to 'put them in their place). If the insult wasn't in comparing someone to a female dog it would just be 'dog'. Which it isn't.
When the swear is tied into its attachment to women and female-ness, and when there are dozens of other swears that are swears because of their attachment to women/female-ness, it's a sexist swear. Regardless of how big of a 'shock' or how taboo it is in casual conversation.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 02:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 02:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 02:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 02:59 am (UTC)(link)What?
Explain to me how I'm doing that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 03:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 03:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Actually, to a lot of people, "bitch" is an insult because they were taught that it's an insult. Really. Very few people are deliberate about the female dog comparison.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 03:59 am (UTC)(link)when I tell people a bitch is a female dog, they give me weird looks and say "lol k" and ignore me
or they laugh and say I'm taking the word too literally
which means they weren't thinking about female dogs when they said it
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 06:09 am (UTC)(link)Just because they're not literally thinking "female dog" every time they say it doesn't erase the meaning and the context of that meaning!
Oh my god, how fucking wilfully simple-minded and ignorant do you have to be to think what you've just said is a good argument? AUGH.
I want to think everyone in this thread arguing for why sexist words aren't sexist is a troll, but unfortunately I am all to aware that this is the attitude most people in the real world share. Which is why sexism is still so very prevalent. Woohoo.
You Win.
(Anonymous) 2012-11-22 07:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Do you honestly think the prevalence of sexism in society is due in significant part to the use of words that most people use outside their original meaning??
no subject
no subject