case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-11-28 05:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2157 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2157 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[2 Broke Girls]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Love Actually]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Me and My Dick]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Journey Into Mystery]


__________________________________________________



06.
[cracked.com]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Ryan Kwanten/L4D2]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Whispering Corridors, Memento Mori, The Wishing Stairs]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Walking Dead (game)]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Kuragehime]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Thor]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Bartimaeus]


__________________________________________________



13.
[The Sentinel]


__________________________________________________



14.
[The Mentalist and The Addams Family]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Skyfall]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Generator Rex]


__________________________________________________



17.
[Partners]


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #308.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2012-11-28 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
AKA stuff I think about when I drink too much caffiene and google won't load.

Hypothetically speaking, since baring your breasts in protest is protected by the first amendment, could I appear on a national broadcast and flash America while shouting "THIS IS A PROTEST. THESE ARE MY PROTEST BOOBS. THIS IS RIGHT-WING AND THIS IS LEFT-WING. SPEND YOUR POLITICAL OUTRAGE LOAD UPON THEM IN UNISION AMERICA!" or whatever is en vogue to shout while flashing your fat balloons for the right to go topless. And then sue the broadcasting company/FCC for a titload of money if someone censored my goodies to comply with regulations?

And if I go to a political rally and shout "Get your politics off my nipples! This is not a protest! I am just flashing you!" And flash everyone am I still covered even though I stated an intent not to take advantage of my first amendment right?

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-28 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
This comment made me asexual. I didn't even think that was a possible thing.

Bobble meat.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-28 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not, any more than it's possible for a comment to make you gay. Orientations do not work that way.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] chardmonster 2012-11-28 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
A WILD JOKE APPEARS

OFFENDED ANONYMOUS PERSON: I CHOOSE YOU

OFFENDED ANONYMOUS PERSON: USE OBVIOUS TRUTH DELIVERED SNIDELY!
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-11-29 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I like this response
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2012-11-28 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Bobble meat is a very sexy euphemism so I think you just have issues with tits.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] chardmonster 2012-11-29 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
How dare you insult me so.

I'll have you know that unreasonable discomfort with the human body is a lifestyle that must be respected.

Angry comment about Sherlock.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-28 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I think...it would really depend on where you were, as much as anything but overall? I doubt is, since it's under protection as an act of protest, which you point blank stated it wasn't. Therefore you were just flashing people which is illegal in a lot, if not all, states.
intrigueing: (cj toby bff)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] intrigueing 2012-11-28 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
"Bobble meat" is officially my new favorite term :)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-28 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I think in the former situation, the news network would voluntarily self-censor, which is their right as private entities. I think you would have a good case if the FCC fined the station, but, you know, they would probably just be like "lol fuck you" and nothing would happen, because that's mostly the way this kind of thing works.

The second is fine, because as far as I know it's perfectly legal to be topless. It is where I am, anyway.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-28 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Where you are =/= everywhere. Where I live it's considered to be illegal, so that really depends on the state, and county/city level laws as to what would happen.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-28 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it being illegal to go topless is really very silly. It's a very silly thing to make illegal. So whether you'd be persecuted for doing it or not, we can certainly say that if you were persecuted, it would be very silly.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, because something being illegal when it isn't where you live is always totally silly, right? : /

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 02:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 05:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 22:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 23:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 15:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 22:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 05:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 22:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 07:08 (UTC) - Expand

SA

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 07:08 (UTC) - Expand
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2012-11-28 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's only a proper protest if there is more than just one person. Thus, I will join you in inviting America to blow it's load all over my protest signs. "Signs" being my tits with phrases or pictures on them. I'm thinking bullseyes drawn around my nipples with the phrase "Suck here, Republican babies!" That's just the opening act, though. As the day goes on I'll add more elaborate body art, such as an elephant fucking a chicken across my back.
insolentwitch: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] insolentwitch 2012-11-28 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
In the second scene, you'd be in trouble. You waived your right to call on the 1st. Although there is a case to be made that "Get your politics off my nipples!" was you protesting the fact that the First Amendment applied to flashing, so you could possibly talk your way out of trouble with a good lawyer.
Edited 2012-11-28 23:55 (UTC)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2012-11-28 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Even if directly afterwards I said it wasn't a protest?
insolentwitch: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] insolentwitch 2012-11-29 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
It'd take a reeeeally good lawyer.
greenvelvetcake: (lower those eyebrows)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2012-11-29 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Bobble meat.

Bobble meat.

Bobble meat.

ANYWAY. I don't think that would fly, it would be considered indecent exposure, at least in America. Also, I'm not sure what the grounds are for suing a broadcast company for censoring you, since it is their company and they choose what they want to air and I'm too lazy to look up precedent.

On the other bobble hand, I totally approve of naming one tit Left-Wing and the other Right-Wing. Who needs a wingman/wingwoman when I've got my own?
cloud_riven: Genshiken's Ogiue wearing a blissful expression after imagining her friends in some frisky scenarios! (I am having meta RPS thoughts)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] cloud_riven 2012-11-29 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry. You lost me at THESE ARE MY PROTEST BOOBS and I misread the rest of that as SPILL YOUR... LOAD UPON THEM IN UNISON AMERICA

oh god this is awkward and i think i like it

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2012-11-29 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Is this a bad time to mention my voting vagina of dissent?

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
You would get arrested for public indecency, be forced to pay a small fine, and gain local infamy as that woman who tried to expose herself on national television. You might have trouble getting a job in the future.

Also, it would be more appropriate to refer to your breasts as "bobble fat and glands." There's no real "meat" in them.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2012-11-29 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
I would be arrested? What if it was a group of protestors? Do we need a protesting permit or some crape?

It's bobble meat as in a slangy name for fat, specifically fat gathered in jiggling bobbles on my chest. Like my bones would be stabby meat if I stabbed people with them. And my muscles are flex meat when I'm showing off. BOOM. LAWYERED.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
If it was a group of protesters, you'd run the risk of inciting public panic and getting shot with a hose or a taser! Since you'd be shirtless, that would really hurt.

"Bobble meat" isn't a commonly-used slang expression, so your defense doesn't stand.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 03:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 05:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) - 2012-11-29 06:37 (UTC) - Expand
caecilia: (Default)

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

[personal profile] caecilia 2012-11-29 07:11 am (UTC)(link)
Did you know about this?

I want to know why it was just the women who got arrested.

Re: First Amendment Hypotheticals ft. My Bobble Meat

(Anonymous) 2012-11-29 07:17 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not happy with this, it should have been 1.5 women and 1.5 men arrested.