Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-10 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #2169 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2169 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #310.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-11 07:37 am (UTC)(link)when you're making knee-jerk reactionary comments to someone who disagrees with you.
Uh, you did that with me. First. You assumed I hadn't accounted for people like you. I had.
no subject
I like the scare quotes around "implications". We all know words don't ever imply things - that's make believe!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-11 08:15 am (UTC)(link)My statement was deliberate and lacked any sort of hidden meaning. I already made a reservation for people who did game yet wanted set protagonists to also have a female option.
You postulated that my theory made no sense because of your existence. I pointed out your existence didn't affect my guess one way or another.
So, on top of a lack of reading comprehension, you also don't know what "implications" means.
no subject
Which is sheer intellectual cowardice, because now anyone who responds to you, as I did, as a counterexample, will be written off as not falling under the "most" - rather, they will be "the exception", so you have conveniently set yourself up with a theory that cannot be proven wrong, because it is what you want to believe about those who disagree with you.
/sigh
I did not misread your first statement. I could, however, have explicitly rather than implicitly made clear the intent behind my counter claim, because you clearly did not understand it - and clarity is important when holding a discussion in writing.