[ SECRET POST #2171 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2171 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #310.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[oroburos69]

For romance novels, not really on the variety thing, and I've never found them all that explicit. Most cater to gender roles so hard that...uh, basically, they have really, really intense gender role reinforcement in them. It's fucking creepy.

But there's romance novels, and then there's erotica. A lot of erotica is actually significantly more explicit than most fanfic--look for the stuff written by anonymous in the bookstore, with black covers, usually. I'm never really sure where people are getting this impression that smut doesn't get published. There's even kinky smut! It's all at your neighborhood bookstore.

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[(Anonymous)]

"Most cater to gender roles so hard that...uh, basically, they have really, really intense gender role reinforcement in them."

Yeah, I prefer fanfiction because that's the only place I can find heterosexual romance that doesn't do that. And pretty much the only place I can find heterosexual erotica without male dominance themes.

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[(Anonymous)]

Dude, your neighbourhood bookstore sounds awesome and win. Is it a Chapters Indigo? I've never seen an erotica section there.

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[oroburos69]

Yeah, actually. I can't remember what they call the section, but it's been in every Chapters I've been in. Usually on the far end of romance or literature.

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[(Anonymous)]

Saweet! I know what I'll be doing on Boxing Day now ;)

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[(Anonymous)]

A lot of erotica is actually significantly more explicit than most fanfic
I doubt this simply because of the types of kinks that are employed in fanfic that would be considered illegal or too offensive to publish.

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah I can't imagine there being much knotting or young teen/adult(among so many, many others) erotica out there.

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[(Anonymous)]

"Explicit" doesn't mean "about weirder shit".

Re: OT question about mainstream erotica

[oroburos69]

It not representing obscure kinks doesn't make it soft-core. It exists, and it's porny--more so than a lot of explicit fic, and it's in book stores. That is the extent of my point.