[ SECRET POST #2176 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2176 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Sorry for late, busy day.

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #311.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[diet_poison]

I just think it's funny. Sexual people = the overwhelming majority of people, so how the fuck do you think you could generalize them in any way???

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[(Anonymous)]

I find it especially amusing that the same people will argue until their blue in the fact that labels like "demisexual" and "grey-A" are necessary, too. I'm not saying they're not necessary - I do think they're helpful for some people - but you can't make sweeping generalizations about "sexuals" and make it sound like we all have the same level of libido/requirements for sleeping with or being in a relationship with someone, while insisting that there should be a label for every slight difference when it comes to asexuality.

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[diet_poison]

Wait

People put "demisexual" under the "asexual" umbrella and not the "sexual" umbrella?

*scratches head*

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[(Anonymous)]

Yep. On the one hand, I can kind of understand how it falls under the asexual umbrella to a degree, but on the other, all of the "I only want to have sex with people when I have an emotional connection with them!" thing makes me just tilt my head and go "... that's not that unusual?" Then again, it may just be that I've been seeing really shitty explanations of it, and that's why I can't quite wrap my head around it.

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[(Anonymous)]

I think the idea is supposed to be that it's not only "want to have sex with someone unless there's an emotional bond" but "never get turned on or experience physical attraction unless there's an emotional bond".

I may not personally be interested in having sex with someone who I'm not in a relationship with, but that doesn't mean I stop having a libido when I'm single.

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[diet_poison]

Yeah if that's what it's supposed to mean then it makes sense. I wonder if that's really a thing that a lot of people experience, hmmm. Or if it really needs to be its own "orientation".

Re: Non-fandom confessions/unpopular opinions!

[diet_poison]

Yeah, and I really kinda relate to that too? The only person I've ever actively *wanted* to sleep with was my ex-boyfriend of over three years. And that kind of deep desire only comes for me when I get really close to someone. I mean I can look at a guy and go "man he's attractive" but that doesn't mean I want to fuck him? And I know there are a lot of different way of seeing this and I'm not necessarily in the majority here, but I also know it really isn't uncommon. So if that's what "demisexual" is supposed to mean I think it's just really dumb... (And I am definitely a "sexual" person)

But then again maybe it's not what it's supposed to mean *shrug*