Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-06 03:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2196 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2196 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #314.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - empty image with a text comment ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-06 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)I've no idea if the one I read is representative of the general trend. But basically whether the Omegaverse fic carries the extra warnings or not, I tend to consider the tag synonymous with non-con/dub-con, because it's too risky to do otherwise.
So, yes. I scroll past them. YKINMK. Um. Rather emphatically.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 01:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 01:33 am (UTC)(link)The fic I read didn't have any notification in summary or tags that it was going to involve dub-con or non-con. Not knowing what A/B/O was, that meant I got ... Um. Whammied. I mean ... I'm guessing you had an idea from fannish osmosis? But that's not exactly reliable, depending on what circles/fandoms someone's being moving in.
As I said, I've started assuming it involves them now. But to get to that, I had to read that first one. And that ... was not a pleasant surprise.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 02:36 am (UTC)(link)Um. I mean, I get what you're saying, why they don't. I just wish they would, is all.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-07 06:23 am (UTC)(link)Until someone publishes that guide that was talked about a few days ago and makes it mandatory reading for newbies, there's still going to be triggering that's accidental on both sides.