[ SECRET POST #2209 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2208 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 121 secrets from Secret Submission Post #316.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "gay husbandos"

[(Anonymous)]

So should they have said "the radio host couple of unspecified gender and sexuality" or something? Just to ease your easily aggrevated SJ mind?

Re: "gay husbandos"

[(Anonymous)]

1.) "Husbands", "couple", "boyfriends", "the radio guys who are sweet on each other". It's actually pretty easy to define that two people are romantically involved without needing to specify their sexuality. You wouldn't say "the cute straight couple" or "the adorable lesbian and her bisexual partner".

2.) "SJ"
This is quickly becoming a thought-terminating cliche, and it needs to die. You're saying I'm part of the social justice subculture because I commented about something that they (apparently) have also taken objection to. This makes it easy to dismiss my opinion on the basis that I'm "one of those".

3.) No, I'm not aggravated. I'm creeped out by another point in a trend.

da

[(Anonymous)]

Except that just saying "couple" could mean they're a straight couple, which they aren't. And that's part of what's nice about it - the fact that there is a gay couple in major roles who are portrayed in a positive fashion instead of being a joke or a running gag.

Maybe OP DOES like them together because they're gay. Maybe OP is gay themselves. As a bisexual person myself, seeing non-heterosexual canon couples in media makes me happy, and when I see them, you're damn right I'm going to point them out. Because I like seeing people like me treated as normal in the media.

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, this. Exactly.

ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

This is entirely valid, and I cede your point. I hadn't considered that. Maybe I'm spending too much time on tumblr. :(

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

all of this. I don't have much of a problem colloquially calling couples a "gay couple," because that's really more about defining the nature of the relationship (that is, they're a couple of the same sex) without actually making assumptions about the sexualities of those involved. And as shallow as it may be, I also tend to like characters/couples more when they're not heterosexual for the same reason - it's awesome to see people like me being normalized in media.

I do have a problem with "husbandos." Are English words just not good enough for people? WTF.

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think that's shallow at all, I think it's perfectly natural to be happy when you see people who are like you in media.

Re: "gay husbandos"

[(Anonymous)]

LOL SJ troll. Nice try.

ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

You responded to a comment that pointed out how "LOL SJW" is a way of dismissing something without having to think of a counterargument...by saying "LOL SJW" so you could dismiss that point without having to think of a counterargument. Well done. You're either a troll yourself or you really don't care. Neither is particularly admirable.

Re: "gay husbandos"

[(Anonymous)]

OP

This is hilarious, thanks for the entertainment wank anon.

Re: "gay husbandos"

[caecilia]

I say "the cute straight couple".