Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-26 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #2216 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2216 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Dude can't into physiology? I get that that's a common myth - like the people who think women have more ribs, or fewer teeth - but it could be dispelled with even the slightest amount of research. And it wasn't like he was trying to portray the character as believing a myth, either - the character was correct, and was portrayed as being very clever and observant.
I don't even know, dude. But then again Aristotle himself couldn't be assed to look into a woman's mouth and just blindly believed the teeth thing, too. And I mean, those are demonstrable untruths. For the Mars/Venus sociological stuff, there's all kinds of dumb horseshit people believe are just factual differences between the sexes.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 01:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 07:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
EDIT so that you don't waste your time if you mean what I think you mean: The carrying angle (which wouldn't have been observed in the posture Eddings was describing; it's measured with the arms extended downwards, palm up) right? The slight difference in bone alignment that has nothing to do with the way the joint is "hinged"? The variation that has "extensive overlap in the carrying angle between individual men and women, and a sex-bias has not been consistently observed in scientific studies"?
That, uh, what he was supposed to be using to know for certain it was a woman in a posture that would have made observing it impossible, using a trait that occurs similarly in both sexes.
Come on dude.