case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-26 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #2216 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2216 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 07:07 am (UTC)(link)
Uh maybe because if you had even the slightest bit of biological/physical knowledge of the human body, you would know that women's elbows are hinged differently from men's.
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2013-01-27 10:39 am (UTC)(link)
Women's elbows aren't synovial hinges? News to me, Dr. Internet! Our ball joined elbows must be totally rad! Or are men's elbow joints not synovial hinges?

EDIT so that you don't waste your time if you mean what I think you mean: The carrying angle (which wouldn't have been observed in the posture Eddings was describing; it's measured with the arms extended downwards, palm up) right? The slight difference in bone alignment that has nothing to do with the way the joint is "hinged"? The variation that has "extensive overlap in the carrying angle between individual men and women, and a sex-bias has not been consistently observed in scientific studies"?

That, uh, what he was supposed to be using to know for certain it was a woman in a posture that would have made observing it impossible, using a trait that occurs similarly in both sexes.

Come on dude.
Edited 2013-01-27 11:03 (UTC)