[ SECRET POST #2216 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2216 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

When exactly was she meant to throw it in? He's a teacher and the books is from a child's pov. It's not exactly appropriate for a teacher to talk about their (past) sex life with a kid.

It's nice she mentioned it at all, although no she's not a lgbt beacon. But I appreciate the fact a well know and loved character was revealed to be gay...after everyone loved and mourned him. They had no chance to complain for a book to change since the series was done and gone.

- from a gay anon

[(Anonymous)]

Discussing homosexuality does not = Dumbledore talking about his sex life, just like Snape being heterosexual/in love with Lily does not = Snape talking about fucking Lily. It's funny that, as a gay person, you're still making the leap in logic that the heteronormative media makes, that a character is somehow sexually explicit purely for being non-straight.

[(Anonymous)]

You still don't address the point though. When would it have made narrative sense to discuss Dumbledore's romantic life with his students? We still don't know ANYTHING about McGonagall's romantic situation. Know why? Because it never fucking mattered in the story.