Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-02 03:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #2223 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2223 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 127 secrets from Secret Submission Post #318.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:11 am (UTC)(link)Prob impossible, but try to keep this mostly about how you imagine you'd feel about it as an adult, and not about whether you support or not.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:41 am (UTC)(link)But the male privilege would be sweet.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 07:13 am (UTC)(link)Can't help but work 'what about teh womynz??' into even something like this huh.
Hope you enjoy the replacement privilege of knowing you might get your head kicked in for looking at someone the wrong way.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:20 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 05:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
The results are generally very poor, and even under ideal conditions it's a base mimicry of what they're trying to achieve.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)Reconstructing skin is a cosmetic thing. They can't regenerate the nerve endings.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 05:38 am (UTC)(link)But not hugely caring. It's not like men are discriminated on because of their penis.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:18 am (UTC)(link)I honestly can't imagine how I'd feel. I do know that if we ever have a son that we're having him circumcised. He can go through the restoration if he wants when he is older because it is much safer than adult circumcision. By that time actual skin transplants will probably be the norm and it will be a true foreskin, anyway.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 07:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 09:05 (UTC) - Expand9.5/10
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 11:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 13:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 13:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 16:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 16:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 16:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:52 am (UTC)(link)I ... know that pretty much any surgery that was done to me for non-medical reasons, I'd resent, and the more invasive and personal the more I'd probably resent it. I'm not religious at all, so having a part of my body (even if it were minor) removed for religious reasons would probably feel like a gross violation because I would never consent to that, and I'd still have to deal with the consequences of its having been done. And from what I've read, the foreskin has tons of nerve endings and not having it diminishes one's capacity for sexual pleasure, so I don't imagine I'd be at all okay with that, either. And really, if I wouldn't let a doctor handle and cut my daughter's external genitalia, it seems just as reprehensible to let that be done to a boy. I'd probably consider it a betrayal if my parents let that be done to me. I mean - if I was up to my eyeballs in a culture that was completely convinced that circumcision was synonymous with real masculinity, and a guy who wasn't had to deal with a lot of discrimination and social crap, I might not consider it abuse. But I think that a procedure grown men very rarely volunteer for shouldn't be inflicted on infants, and I hope I'd still think that as a man.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:53 am (UTC)(link)Anyway- as long as it was done properly I don't think I'd mind.
FTR I'm not exactly pro-circumcision, but I had a circumcised ex who was.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 08:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 08:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) - 2013-02-03 10:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)I already have feelings along those lines for an appearance-normalizing surgery I had during my teens that I did more or less consent to: It has side effects that I have to live with on a daily basis and lately I keep thinking about the effects that were predicted for if I didn't have the surgery, and wondering if I actually made the right decision.
I think the lack of consent might make me kind of resentful. Informed consent is super-important to me because of my own medical history (which I assume would be unchanged in a male me), and even though a foreskin is comparatively minor compared to the other stuff I've been through, my emotions about the other things would likely carry over.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)My best(male)friend has a lot of issues mixed up with the fact that he was circumcised. He's looked into surgery to fix it and everything.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)Seeing as I'm not Jewish, and lots of the boys I would have been friends with would have been uncircumcised, I would have probably felt self-conscious about it and a little annoyed that it would have been decided without me.(but also grateful cos of hygiene etc)