Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-02 03:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #2223 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2223 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 127 secrets from Secret Submission Post #318.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:18 am (UTC)(link)I honestly can't imagine how I'd feel. I do know that if we ever have a son that we're having him circumcised. He can go through the restoration if he wants when he is older because it is much safer than adult circumcision. By that time actual skin transplants will probably be the norm and it will be a true foreskin, anyway.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 06:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 07:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
Even if that wasn't the case, that's not a very legitimate reason for stripping a child of their bodily autonomy. Please reconsider.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 09:05 am (UTC)(link)Puh-lease. It's a scrap of skin. "Bodily autonomy" lol.
Also, you have no right to say sanctimonious bullcrap like that.
9.5/10
You know how to do wank anon.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 11:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)Foreskins may be comparatively small potatoes and the other factors described above may outweigh those this case, but they aren't minor considerations and I would have a lot less bitterness and fear toward the medical establishment if I'd had physicians who cared more about them.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)It's all about context. Of the reasons we have for choosing this, it is comparatively minor. I am not trivializing informed consent or bodily autonomy. In this case, it is up to us to make the decision based upon informed consent. That doesn't mean deciding based on incomplete data spoon-fed to us by a doctor or some anti-circumcision activists on the internet. It means learning all we can about the issue, to include learning from others' experiences. It means weighing all the risks, considering the life-long impact of our decision, and making a decision. This is called the decision making process. And because circumcision has been an issue in my SO's family, we chose to do it all before we have a son so we're not making a momentous decision at the last second when we're emotional and overwhelmed and unable to take in all the ramifications.
You're projecting. Your bitterness and fears of the medical establishment are your own. I have medical issues that require frequent treatment for the rest of my life. Because I ask questions and do a lot of research, I have no fear of the medical establishment and certainly no bitterness for the many professionals who have helped to treat me.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)...based on the language of your your complaints about 'spoon-feeding' and activists, you sound as if you may be doing some projecting as well.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)I have no idea what you've been through but I have nightmare scenarios playing out in my mind about how a doctor can perform procedures on a patient without consent. They all involve the use of general anesthesia and scare the hell out of me. If a doctor did something to you without your consent that wasn't explicitly in an effort to save your life when you were incapacitated to deny treatment and didn't have a living will, you need to report them. Report them to the facility's ombudsman, the AMA, your health insurance provider, your congressman, and your local media. It is NEVER acceptable for them to do that and they are a danger to patients who must be stopped.
Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Not trying to start wank but Q for females
And violating that consent isn't minor, it's sort of a big deal.
You're clearly utterly uniformed though, because you bring up the hygiene thing as a reason. You live in the first world, teach your son to have a fucking bath once in a blue moon and that's no issue at all.