case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-16 04:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #2237 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2237 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 113 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dreemyweird: (Default)

Re: Ridiculous question for linguists/ language-likers

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-02-17 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
I actually think that the worst part of English is conditionals. All the would/would've been/was stuff. Verbs aren't that hard, especially considering the fact that even the irregular ones have some change patterns (learn-learnt, keep-kept, creep-crept etc.)

!
Good luck) Russian has a lot of exceptions and strange structure, that's why it may be hard. For example, nouns change differently according to which group they are in (there are three groups).
Also the syntax is very flexible, and one sentence can have five or ten legitimate variations.
You can say "Why are you here?" or you can say "You are here why?" or "You why are here?", all of them are correct. It's a bit like Yoda's speech.
Good news, though, is that there are only six noun forms and three tenses.
Stresses are completely random... there's simply no rule for those.

As to Estonian, you hit home here: nina taga cases evolved from the "preposition+noun" constructions. In fact, some of them are still used with prepositions, which is rather silly, because when one says "ilma piimata", it essentially means "without without milk".