case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-20 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2241 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. removed!


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (minorly sexual, illustrated) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2013-02-20 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

[ 1 (minorly sexual, illustrated) - not!secrets ]
nan: (Default)

[personal profile] nan 2013-02-20 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Why is there blood everywhere in this picture?! ....unless those are guidelines or something idk.

Anyway, lol what a shitty opinion.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
red sketch-lines maybe?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-23 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
Is it just me or is this some seriously shitty fanart? I can't even tell who the characters are supposed to be.
insolentwitch: (Default)

NS

[personal profile] insolentwitch 2013-02-20 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
What about Poly relationships? Are they just "kinks"?
merryghoul: mike pilot (mike pilot)

Re: NS

[personal profile] merryghoul 2013-02-21 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
My thoughts exactly.
kamino_neko: Kamino Neko's evil icon. (Evil)

Re: NS

[personal profile] kamino_neko 2013-02-21 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
Polyamory is just a failed attempt to justify threesomes, you silly, silly person.

Re: NS

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
I was under the impression that poly relationships are compromises where one person has several partners and the partners are okay with sharing? Unlike OT3's where they all bone each other in equal measure?

Granted I don't know this stuff but I'm willing to learn

Re: NS

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] caecilia - 2013-02-21 01:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] metal_equine - 2013-02-21 04:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] caecilia - 2013-02-21 10:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] metal_equine - 2013-02-21 16:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] caecilia - 2013-02-21 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] citrinesunset - 2013-02-21 03:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 14:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 03:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] wldcatsprstr_14 - 2013-02-21 01:17 (UTC) - Expand
nobara: Something is very, very wrong here. (what the......hell?)

[personal profile] nobara 2013-02-21 12:02 am (UTC)(link)

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you for reminding me to check back on that Tony/Loki/Pepper fic, and that Loki/Thor/Jane fic too.

(no subject)

[personal profile] ypsilon42 - 2013-02-21 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

[personal profile] charming_stranger - 2013-02-21 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] ypsilon42 - 2013-02-21 19:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 23:16 (UTC) - Expand
greenvelvetcake: (popcorn)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2013-02-21 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Can polygamywank be the new racewank?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 00:45 (UTC) - Expand
riddian: (Default)

[personal profile] riddian 2013-02-21 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Just yesterday troll secrets weren't getting linked. What happened? Was this one funnier than the rest?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
in a way, i kind of agree. but not in any real way, especially not to argue it...it's just a kind of feeling i have. or a confusion. i just can't wrap my mind around how that could actually function. but, well, i'm not saying that it can't function...just that i'd have to see it to believe it (or understand it).

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
"OTP+3"? Wouldn't that be the OTP plus three of their friends, thus making it a five-some?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Good to know my relationship is just a kink to you. Good thing I don't care (as I don't think threesome writers care either).
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-02-21 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Yes I'm sure your opinion is very valuable to those who practice polyamory. Presumably polyamory will become an extinct practice thanks to your intelligent insight.

Fizzled

[personal profile] trollometer 2013-02-21 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
Too bad you got fail!bar'd. This is perfect. Rephrase and try again? Pro-tip: state your secret as an opinion and not as a fact.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
In a way a agree, but that's only because most OT3s (and OT5s and OT6s) fics in my fandoms are written as a kink, but never as an actual polyamorous relationships.
And all the people I know who insist "OT3s solve everything" or "Just have a threesome" are usually only into it for the kink and think they're more "open minded" than people who only have OTPs :/

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 21:55 (UTC) - Expand
laughingpineapple: (Default)

[personal profile] laughingpineapple 2013-02-21 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Elfquest would love a word with you, nonny.

(First canon, longstanding, functional three-way relationship between main characters I could think of, I'm sure there's others.)

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 02:59 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
I agree in a way though. Yes there is polyamory, but a three-way relationship is very difficult to maintain. I'm not saying that it can't be done, but it's hard to do. All parties involved have to be completely okay with sharing their lover and being shared. That's not an easy thing for most people and typically three-way relationships do fail. Once again, not all of them, but it's pretty rare for them to succeed in real life.

As for in relation to fandom, I agree that OT3's are just pretty much there to fulfill a sexual kink. Most people figure, "I like this pairing and this pairing, so why don't I just combine them into an OT3 and make them have kinky sex!" It's just... Ugh. OT3's are usually pretty OOC and once again, just there for fap material for horny fangirls.

I agree with the patronizing comments too. Some people who prefer OT3's seem to be kind of condescending in thinking that they're above the average shipper because they're more 'open-minded.' It's a bunch of bullshit.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-21 08:21 (UTC) - Expand

Okay no, fuck you.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry but don't tell me that my relationship doesn't fucking exist and isn't relevant. I am in a very functional long term relationship; myself (a female) and two men. We live in the same house. We do laundry and groceries and mow the lawn. We support each other and laugh together and cry together. We are just like ANY OTHER RELATIONSHIP except that there happens to be three of us. That's not a fucking "sexual kink," that's a god damn relationship.

We are by NO MEANS unique, either. Tilda Swinton is a good example; she's got a husband and another man she maintains a relationship with, and it's a situation they're comfortable with.

I agree with you that "lol just have them all fuck" isn't a solution that works. That isn't how it is in the real world. But to hell with you if you're going to patronize my relationship and minimize it to just ~lol sex.~

Re: Okay no, fuck you.

[personal profile] thaurfea - 2013-02-22 05:11 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
And to me your monogamy is a weird kink. Satisfied? Now I was as judgmental as you.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-21 09:43 am (UTC)(link)
This wouldn't be nearly as funny if you didn't sound like a total hypocrit. Patronizing, eh? You reek of butthurt shipper, btw.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-22 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
My two girlfriends and I are laughing at you.

(Anonymous) 2013-02-24 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're seious, you fail.

And if you're a troll, you also fail- especially since there are simple guidelines that could've gotten this one into the main post if read and followed.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-02-24 18:38 (UTC) - Expand