[ SECRET POST #2241 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. removed!


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (minorly sexual, illustrated) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

NS

[insolentwitch]

What about Poly relationships? Are they just "kinks"?

Re: NS

[merryghoul]

My thoughts exactly.

Re: NS

[kamino_neko]

Polyamory is just a failed attempt to justify threesomes, you silly, silly person.

Re: NS

[(Anonymous)]

I was under the impression that poly relationships are compromises where one person has several partners and the partners are okay with sharing? Unlike OT3's where they all bone each other in equal measure?

Granted I don't know this stuff but I'm willing to learn

Re: NS

[(Anonymous)]

there are lots of different setups for polyamory. I think the three-people-one-relationship dynamic (there's a name for this but I can't remember it and am lazy) is overrepresented in fandom compared to real life, but ...so is gayness and plenty of other things, ha.

Re: NS

[caecilia]

that's an open relationship

a three-person partnership would be a triad

Re: NS

[metal_equine]

Triad if all are involved all around. If it's one person with two partners, who are not involved with each other, I'd specify that as a V.

Re: NS

[caecilia]

That's what I meant by 'partnership'. I hadn't heard of V before. Makes sense.

Re: NS

[metal_equine]

Oh, you're right. I missed that part. *blames lack of caffeine*

I've read up on and discussed polyamory a lot as I am currently in a poly relationship. ( That's three of us in my icon. I need to make a new one as there are people added.)

Re: NS

[caecilia]

That's okay, I thought I might have worded it too vaguely.

Cute! I had done a little bit of research a while ago because I was curious about it.

Re: NS

[(Anonymous)]

It's not like it's a sexuality like being gay. So what does that make it?

Re: NS

[citrinesunset]

A relationship style? A lifestyle? That's how I'd describe it. I mean, you wouldn't call monogamy a kink.

Re: NS

[(Anonymous)]

Thank you. I agree that you wouldn't call monogamy a kink so that is why I asked the question. But calling it a lifestyle makes perfect sense.

Re: NS

[(Anonymous)]

It's just a relationship style; it's a certain way of functioning that works for those within it. Granted, "polyamorous" is a broad term, just like "monogamous," when it comes to this, as there are certain specific ways of functioning within both categories, but there's nothing really kinky or fetishistic about it, unless you can define monogamy the same way.

Re: NS

[(Anonymous)]

I once heard someone describe it as such actually. Me not being poly, and him not being gay, it seemed sketchy.

Re: NS

[wldcatsprstr_14]

OP is just wank-baiting.