fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2249 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2249 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Otoyomegatari]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Girls und Panzer]

__________________________________________________

04.

[My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Monster High]

__________________________________________________

06.

[My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Jackass 3D]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Paranatural]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Angelina Jolie]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Der Ring des Nibelungen]

__________________________________________________

11.

[Mary Shelley's Frankenhole]

__________________________________________________

12.

[Medium]

__________________________________________________

13.

[The Americans]

__________________________________________________

14.

[The Mindy Project]

__________________________________________________

15.

[5Dolls, T-ARA]

__________________________________________________

16.

[A Good Day To Die Hard]

__________________________________________________

17.

[Harry Potter]

__________________________________________________

18. http://i45.tinypic.com/2v0bjpd.jpg
[linked for porn, Spartacus: Vengeance]

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #321.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Nah, then it would be anons saying to other anons, "I bet you're white, cis, straight, rich, American, fill in the blank with whatever" whenever they disagree with someone's point of view. It would all boil down to this every time.

It would be a train wreck.

i disagree. i have seen intelligent anon discussions here. i've also seen completely vitriolic crap spat back and forth between non-anons. what it boils down to is that it's going to be the same group of people regardless. no more messy, no less messy.

THIIIIIIIIIIIIIS

When they can just look at me and think, "Well if Gandalf thinks so, it has to be right."

Sorry but I have to ask: What is Gandalf even doing in that gif?

He is sneering at Pippin after he knocked the skeleton down the well.

Nope, but thanks for the strawmans.
It will be much the same. Wank will happen with or without usernames. ~human nature~ and ~differing opinions~ will result into that

Case in point, you manage to be insulting even with an account and immediatly dismiss OP!anon with the bizarre idea everyone would devolve into a wank fest.
No better than pretending it would be all anons bein SJWs

You just kind of proved my point, anon.

DA

No, they really didn't.

...Mekkio sort of did. Their point (I presume) was that even without accounts anons would still be making huge assumptions about each other. Anon was making a big assumption about mekkio--they they were being insulting and dismissive, even though they weren't. They simply attacked the other side with great prejudice.

Anon-only wouldn't solve that.

mekkio was making a point that anons would make assumptions about other anons. since the anon was making an assumption about a user with a name and history, anon actually disproved mekkio's point, which was that having everybody anon would make things worse. in actuality things would not change, because whether a person is posting anon or with an identity, this group of people we have here like to make assumptions about each other, regardless of whether their target is posting with an identity or anon.

I presume mekkio's point was that EVERYONE makes assumptions about each other regardless of accounts. Specifically saying that anons will make assumptions about other anons.

That fact that one anon was willing to make an assumption of a user strengthens their point.

My presumption is mekkio supports users posting because at least it isn't a completer clusterfuck.

i think we're understanding mekkio's point differently. i think previous anon understood it in the way i understood it. mekkio was not as clear as they needed to be, in any case, and you are furthering what you think is her point but may not have been. which is fine, as it is a point regardless, but, well, this argument is now pointless, is all i'm trying to say. arguing over technicalities is tedious when things are somewhat unclear.

noooooo? mekkio seems to think that if everyone's anon it will turn into a wankfest...therefore leading into the weird and incorrect idea that usernames somehow reduce wank or arguments

I beg to differ as FS would not change in the drastic way they seem to think. wank levels would remain much the same and Mekkio is being rather insulting and dismissive in their attitude that being anon = trollish mass or more wank simply because of anonyminity. it's the same people as usual, the wank will ebb and flow as usual, anon or not.

AYRT

*looks at what you post*

*looks at what I post*

I think you need your eyes checked, username. why don't you make more blanket assumptions

[ SECRET POST #2249 ]

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon

Re: anon