case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-03-02 03:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2251 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2251 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 112 secrets from Secret Submission Post #322.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
lyndis: (André OM NOM NOM)

[personal profile] lyndis 2013-03-02 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Fire Emblem? Robin? If so: Do it anyway, Anon. Honestly, so far there have been few if any things that have the tactician as a legitimate character in his own right, and at least in FE13 he's his (or her) own character. So long as you stick with the consistent characterization of him/her presented in the game, I think it would really just impress people (vs. turning them off).

If not, I'd still say to do it anyway.
croik: (Default)

[personal profile] croik 2013-03-02 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Fire Emblem was my first thought, too. I even made Robin a girl in order to marry her to Chrom because I just assumed that was the most canon option. Their actual supports really let me down so I'm eager to play again with a male tactician, since I hear they're different (I guess they'd have to be). Either way shipping Chrom/Robin is just as canon to me as Chrom/Anyone so why not?
lyndis: (Kentspiration)

[personal profile] lyndis 2013-03-03 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the female and male tactician, despite sharing a lot of the same dialogue, seem to have completely different personalities. Personally I prefer the male Robin.
lyndis: (Oscar's Gift)

[personal profile] lyndis 2013-03-03 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
As an aside, this secret was so long I think most people just skipped over it, tbh.

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-03-03 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
I am so transparent. Yes, it's Robin. I'm trying to stick with canon characterization especially since I've seen stuff on FFnet where people aren't.
lyndis: (Zebra Pretty)

Re: OP

[personal profile] lyndis 2013-03-03 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I've seen a lot of people on FFn who are just writing self-inserts like they were back with FE7. If you stick with canon characterization I'm sure it'll go over well! I actually thought m!Robin was really, really well-characterized, and I found myself thinking that if Mark in FE7 had been written the same way (with actual dialogue of his own/etc) the whole "tactician is sorta you" idea might have gone over a lot better!

That said, yay! A Fire Emblem secret! Hurrah! I am quite pleased. :D

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-03-03 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I tend to avoid FFn like the plague, mostly because the quality has gone down a lot. Not everything, just, Sturgeon's Law/Sturgeon's Revelation really applies there.

Also M!Robin & Chrom's supports are ridiculously ship-worthy, even for a JRPG.

I love all the supports in that game