[ SECRET POST #2251 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2251 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 112 secrets from Secret Submission Post #322.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

COD

[ill_omened]

It's 2013.

Why can't you let me play dress up with my mans.

Or at the very least give me a range of characters to choose from in the vein of GoW.

Also @Battlefield I guess.

Re: COD

[(Anonymous)]

Doesn't add value for the core demo, but does complicate the user experience and create extra work.

Or something like that. Was probably the rationale they used. If they even considered it.

Re: COD

[ill_omened]

But a huge emphasis on the muti-player user experience is the customisation options that are present.

Just look at the attention played to perks, weapons, and the development of the emblem system.

Re: COD

[(Anonymous)]

Eh. I'm not saying it was a good decision, I'm just saying that's probably the rationale. And in response to your point, they'd probably says the demo cares a lot more about customizing weapons and gameplay and shit than about customizing how they look. That reasoning is obviously somewhat specious, but I think it does have at least a certain logic to it from a profit and loss standpoint.

Re: COD

[dethtoll]

If they did that they'd probably charge for the pleasure, though.

Re: COD

[ariakas]

I have less than zero desire to pay money for hats for my CoD avatars. That's what the emblem maker is for.

...

...R6V2 had a pretty cool shootanmans fashionshow mode, though.