Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-03-02 03:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2251 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2251 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 112 secrets from Secret Submission Post #322.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I mean...he could have mentioned Swordfish instead of Monster's Ball, but he didn't.
He specifically targeted films that were up for nominations of some sort.
And nobody thinks that may be the point? Why did the 4 movies mentioned that have rape scenes NEED for the audience to see their breasts? Why did these movies need that at all?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-03 05:09 am (UTC)(link)Why is that the bit folks defending the song come down on?
Because breasts are a part of a woman's body. Because in rape/abuse, they are often targeted. Because movies are a form of visual story-telling, and a movie can be "Oscar Bait" but still be a good movie that did everything it could to effectively tell a story. Because seeing a woman's battered body after a rape scene should elicit feelings of horror and sympathy, not tittering at boobies. Because the context of the scenes would have made it stupid and childish to play camera tricks to avoid the dreaded breast shot.
Because breasts are natural things, and that's okay, and maybe we're all grown-ups and don't need to titter ever time we see some, regardless of the context.
(And it's still a moot point because one of the "saw your boobs!" WASN'T EVEN A MOVIE.)
no subject
Because our entertainment industry sees a woman's body as its ticket to a winning movie. Not as a person, as a money ticket. We never seen men's nudity. When we do? It's considered NC-17, because no one wants to see a PERSON like that. Women? They aren't people, so it's A-OK.
And you can get the same, emotional response from a rape scene WITHOUT having to show off the boobs.
His song was literally making fun of everyone who had that reaction. "Oh, we see so-and-so's boobs? I'm in!!"
no subject
no subject
Though the remark about Scar Jo is, yeah....typical male there.
no subject
And yeah, the Scar Jo reference was pretty crass and didn't even fit at all if the joke was supposed to be about Oscar-bait nudity.