Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-04 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2284 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2284 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #326.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random porn ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)Pretty cool to see they've considered the fact there's no reason to privilege religion above other ideologies or group identifiers and doubled down and taken that to its logical conclusion.
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
It was Dumbleydore
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
wait really
hey cops how about you actually record offences against members of the groups you just mentioned as hate crimes before you worry about our gothic population
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
do?
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
I am sure made from firsthand experience of the way that the Met, and GMP deal with hate crimes and hate incidents. Surely speaking from a position of being aware of the level of importance senior officers impress upon their people to properly categorise and deal with such occurrences because it's a political hot topic with huge negative ramifications if screwed up.
Please, do tell me more.
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
when i see legislation like this i'm always really skeptical, first of the basis (apart from the murders mentioned in the article--who determined what qualifies as an "alternative subculture" and based on what statistics) and second of if and how it's going to actually be enforced, especially when it seems so vague. it's one thing to put a law in place to appease people and it's another to actually utilize it effectively.
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 12:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 04:42 am (UTC)(link)For me, the defining factors of a hate crime are (1) that it targets people based on membership in a group that forms a significant component of their identity, whether innate or chosen, and (2) that it targets them specifically and solely because of that identity characteristic, in a way that implicitly threatens and intimidates all members of that group.
There's a difference between a hobby and a subculture/lifestyle. The reason we punish hate crimes more harshly than the equivalent "normal" crime is that hate crimes terrorize an entire community in addition to the physical harm they inflict upon the victim. I think explicit anti-subculture violence fits that description.
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 01:45 am (UTC)(link)That's the one that messes it all up. Either you open the floodgates, or you kick it from the protected categories. Which given that the latter is politically untenable, leaves us with the former.
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Mind you, I'm not saying it's okay to hate people or commit crimes against them based on whatever subculture they are a part of, just that it shouldn't be considered a hate crime
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 04:32 am (UTC)(link)I don't like the emphasis on "you CHOOSE to be goth, etc." for a couple of reasons. First, it sounds kind of really victim-blamey, like if they didn't want to be targeted for this kind of violence, they should just give up this subculture/presentation that they've made a significant part of their identity (and yes, there are lifelong goths and whatnot). Second, I reject the notion that I'm ALWAYS going to be Catholic despite having walked away from the religion. Besides which, it implies that converts cannot be the target of violence on the basis of their adopted religion, even if they are dressed in a way that clearly identifies them as a member of that faith (for instance, Muslim converts wearing hijab).
For me, the defining factors of a hate crime are (1) that it targets people based on membership in a group that forms a significant component of their identity, whether innate or chosen, and (2) that it targets them specifically and solely because of that identity characteristic, in a way that implicitly threatens and intimidates all members of that group. It's that implicit threat that makes it a hate crime, and as long as the group you're threatening has a single, unifying identity, I don't see how it becomes a "lesser" form of terrorism if the identity is a chosen one.