Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-10 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #2290 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2289 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Dangan Ronpa]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Berserk]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Thomas Was Alone]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Paranatural]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Supernatural]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Christoph Waltz]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Lost In Austen]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Les Miserables]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Harry Potter]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Amanda Palmer]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Bioshock Infinite]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Red Riding Hood]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Girls Next Door]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Arthur]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Roosterteeth]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I totally see it.
Nothing against how the game does it, it's just very frustrating, I imagine. It doesn't help the main two characters are white and there's only one major black character and she is actually said aloud to be just as bad as the racist murderous kidnapping genocidal asshole.
Again, I understand it's about extremism. But the game was not morally or philosophically deep enough, I think, to go over these kind of issues, since it abandoned the civil war and Vox Populi as a premise half way through the game.
no subject
I think as far as that subject went any choice they'd have made was a no win situation unless they changed the game entirely.
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
Also, Ken Levine says (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwsjALh2vYA) that Daisy exists the way she does for a reason. Black and poor people were at the bottom of the rung in Columbia, it took someone with her kind of experience and resentment to rise up so forcefully. Her race is a part of her character, and maybe he thought her being black better reflected that.
I'm surprised we haven't had feminist wank yet. Oooh! /crosses fingers
/crosses toes
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 12:45 am (UTC)(link)IIRC that's why Malcolm X changed his last name. He didn't want a last name associated with slave owners.
Re: OP
This is all a bit stupid I guess. We'll never know.
no subject
I think as far as that subject went any choice they'd have made was a no win situation unless they changed the game entirely.
Not entirely. It's clear from the game itself and from the marketing that came earlier that it was going to be a very different game. So we're left with a first half that negatively colors the second half, or vice versa.
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Maybe some more POC allies would've been helpful? All I can think of off the top of my head is the gunsmith (sort of) and the mixed-race couple (if you throw the ball at the announcer).
Re: OP
then they'll never be portrayed as really equal or as viable characters?
Yes, but when you have very, very few heroic black characters? This argument falls apart then. And the portrayal of black men in JRPGs is almost always funny black men being totally so black because Japan is massively racist and thinks black guys are hilarious.
Maybe some more POC allies would've been helpful?
It would have been. You do have several sympathetic white characters, even heroic.
That said, the game was about extremism. It's clear the second half of the game suddenly got a huge development shift, because it's clearly setting up this huge civil war and that all gets ignored so it can be refocused on Elizabeth and Booker. The issue is it looks like the devs were *trying* to set up a story that would have more characters, deeper themes, a more complex philosophy that let you understand better the extremism of the first half...but then it gets abandoned. So you're left with your ridiculously over the top extremist lunatics.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 12:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 12:05 am (UTC)(link)She didn't start out that way, though. I've only played the preorder minigame and the game itself, but between those both I got a pretty good idea of how Daisy STARTED with good intentions and ended up as extreme as she did. I wouldn't be surprised if more supplemental materials expand on that even more. (Isn't there a novel about the rise of the Vox?)
Yes, but when you have very, very few heroic black characters? This argument falls apart then.
What about the three black characters in Left 4 Dead 1 and 2? Lee and Clementine in The Walking Dead? Yes, there should be more, but we are getting black heroes, and I don't like the idea that all black characters should be heroes (any more than all female characters in games should be heroic). I want more heroes for sure, but I'll take one character that's actually interesting and well thought out over 10 characters from some sort of oppressed minority or subgroup that are portrayed as good people but are otherwise just...bland.
I do agree that they had a little TOO much plot for their own good, though. It would've been nice if they focused a bit more on the Vox after Comstock House and cleaned up some of those plot wholes before the big timey wimey reveal.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, it wasn't PERFECT, and I would've liked more time with Daisy but I also think that the people saying that the Vox should've been good guys is way off base.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that we'll either get DLC where we can play as Martyr!Booker or Daisy herself. That's my dream.
Re: OP
We do have DLC coming. It did promise more story...
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 02:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 02:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 06:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)Still video games almost never tackle the issue from a non-fantasy standpoint so its not quite as tired as it is in movies or books. Unfortunately, we are unlikely to see it from a non-fantasy setting for awhile, can you imagine the blowup that would occur if a studio full of white male nerds tried to tackle racism or sexism in a serious historical setting, you would be able to see the flame wars from the moon.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 12:06 am (UTC)(link)In regards to Bioshock I get the feeling that they started out with more of a focus on the conflict and then changed it partway through development to more of a character focus. You can see this in the really early trailers that focus on the vox/founder conflict then the later trailers and press releases focusing more and more on Elizabeth and booker.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 12:10 am (UTC)(link)spoilers ofc
the vox populi didn't just represent poc though, they represented the downtrodden and destitute, those who were fucked over by comstock and fink, and that group was comprised mostly of poc and those of irish descent. it could be argued, thus, that daisy could have been white and irish (as iirc they originally intended her to be) but then the wank would be about white saviours (and to an extent it already is since one alternate booker was a martyr for the vox cause).
infinite wasn't telling us that the oppressed were just as bad as comstock, fink and all the other institutional oppressors. infinite was telling us, through fitzroy's cause, that extremism is harmful regardless of which side you are on. fitzroy didn't want to stop at liberating the oppressed or making life better for those people. she wanted to punish the oppressors in violent ways - not just the oppressors, even, but all those associated with them. her focus was on revenge, not a better life, which the game made obvious between first meeting her and watching her die. i equate it to how they portrayed atlas/frank fontaine in bioshock 1, though to a lesser extent. fitzroy was depicted as being a beacon of hope for the otherwise hopeless, but in the end she shows her true colours.
Re: spoilers ofc
I've been following a LP of this and am kind of surprised this would be the case in the fandom--I suppose partially to blame because this is missable, but one of the voxophones (sp?) makes it clear that Booker wasn't trying to be a martyr or hero at all. He just gets used as a martyr after the fact because the circumstances of his death make a good story to rally people around.