case: ([ Zell; BWUH. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-09-17 05:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #255 ]


⌈ Secret Post #255 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 148 secrets from Secret Submission Post #037.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] personal attack.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 18th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2007-09-17 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
so fandom arguments have now come back around to the fact that it's the author's responsibility to educate the reader?

is still something the porn community has to at least consider.

why?

[identity profile] physicsqueen.livejournal.com 2007-09-17 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Because whether or not they like it, it's happening. It's impossible to put things out there for people with the attitude that "this will certainly never impact anyone ever"; well, not impossible persay but at the very least irresponsible. And of course I am aware that I am using "pornography" and "responsibility" simultaniously and that can get murky and whathaveyou, but I don't think it's an issue worth ignoring. I guess I just wish there was a better resource to help deal with it.

As for the first line in your comment, would you agree that the straight pornography industry in the United States has ever educated young men, whether positively or negatively, about sex and how to deal with women? If so then responsibility or not, and whether positively or negatively, the author IS educating the reader. So it's not an issue of IF it's an issue of WHEN and HOW. That's exactly the scenerio I was referring to in my original comment.

(Anonymous) 2007-09-17 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
where do the parents fit in with all this? all the responsibility of the porn industry aside, if a young male watches the interactions of his parents, THAT'S where he forms his initial impressions on how to deal with women, not some orgy on the screen.

how about the author/porn industry reinforcing that what they are producing is FANTASY and how it is NOT representative of reality?

[identity profile] physicsqueen.livejournal.com 2007-09-17 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly. I totally agree with your second statement, and I already agreed with your first (in my original comment). Parents should be talking to their children about these issues; ignoring them at best does nothing and at worst throws the child without a lifejacket into a sea of confusion regarding sexuality and sexual identity.

The fantasy/reality thing is completely what I was trying to talk about (sorry if I wasn't specific or failed at wording it right) and it's of course an issue that has to be dealt with not just in porn but in the media at large. It is also, of course, something that should be re-enforced by hypothetical teenager's parents, natch.

(Anonymous) 2007-09-18 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Oh good! We were just beating around the same subject. ::g:: I'm glad we managed to hook up.