Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-09-17 05:06 pm
[ SECRET POST #255 ]
⌈ Secret Post #255 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.
11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 148 secrets from Secret Submission Post #037.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] personal attack.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 18th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-09-17 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)is still something the porn community has to at least consider.
why?
no subject
As for the first line in your comment, would you agree that the straight pornography industry in the United States has ever educated young men, whether positively or negatively, about sex and how to deal with women? If so then responsibility or not, and whether positively or negatively, the author IS educating the reader. So it's not an issue of IF it's an issue of WHEN and HOW. That's exactly the scenerio I was referring to in my original comment.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-09-17 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)how about the author/porn industry reinforcing that what they are producing is FANTASY and how it is NOT representative of reality?
no subject
The fantasy/reality thing is completely what I was trying to talk about (sorry if I wasn't specific or failed at wording it right) and it's of course an issue that has to be dealt with not just in porn but in the media at large. It is also, of course, something that should be re-enforced by hypothetical teenager's parents, natch.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-09-18 12:09 am (UTC)(link)