Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-07 06:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #2317 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2317 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(That being said, I feel similarly about Loki/Tony, which is also on that list.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)/bitter Coulson/Fury shipper
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
But no it's not near as random, I do agree.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Not slamming you, by the way. I'm just wondering how you interpreted that if the Tony-Loki thing wasn't in it.
no subject
This is exactly my reaction to it (also, they have little to no canon personality, so they're even easier to self-insert/manipulate for the shippers).
(then again, I really can't throw stones with all my crossover femslashing)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)Then again I'm the kind of person who doesn't understand any Tony ship that isn't Tony/Steve, oops.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:27 am (UTC)(link)Then I saw you were a Steve/Tony shipper.
Then I was sad.
/my fandom life
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:42 am (UTC)(link)Now I'm sad, too.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 02:05 am (UTC)(link)(I wasn't bashing or anything, I promise!)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 03:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 01:26 am (UTC)(link)You won't talk to someone because they like a ship that you don't? Classy.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 02:45 am (UTC)(link)Makes me wonder what would have happen to Tony if he'd had a sibling that Howard favored over him. Not excusing it, because Loki dug his own hole, but Tony seems smart enough to understand the sort of motivation that makes starting digging look like a much better idea than it is.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:45 am (UTC)(link)C/C, tho, is SO VERY MUCH rub-white-dick-together, which is why its popularity for me goes from "eh, sad there's so much not-my-ship" to "FOR FUCKSAKE AUUUUGH SHUT UP".
no subject
Some pairings with extensive interaction have small followings while others with little to no interaction hit it big. In most fandoms, I've noticed that canon interaction between the characters often has very little to do with the popularity of the pairing. Usually it's just the characters themselves, their histories personalities. If you look at (MCU) Steve/Tony fics, they often have very little to do with the tension built up in the movies - usually it's related to their personalities (very proper hero with the very improper anti-hero), their histories (daddy issues with Steve and Howard, anyone?), and their backgrounds (old-fashioned man out of time vs modern futurist). Usually, even when their canon interaction is brought up it's mostly in relation to those previous not-directly-canon issues rather than the interaction itself.
*shrugs* Really, most of fandom in general tends to just use canon material as a jumping point and run away from there, if you think about it. ANY pairing - from something as popular as Steve/Tony or canonical as Pepper/Tony to as remote as, IDK, Frigga/Tony (most obscure pairing I could think of that actually has fic for it) needs little to nothing - even if it'll happily take a lot - because most of fandom at large doesn't need that much to go on in the first place.
no subject
If canon interaction were so crucial to any fandom, I doubt we'd see the AUs we do.
A while back I noticed the big difference between fangirls and fanboys. I mean, I hate to generalize based on gender, so maybe it should be more in fangirl/fanboy-dominated space or something like that, but anyway...fanboys seem more invested in what physical actions a character took (can Superman beat the Hulk?), whereas fangirls seem more invested in the emotional actions of the character (what do you think Tony went through when he realized he went farther from Earth than any human being ever and slaughtered thousands, if not millions, of the second alien species to make contact with Earth?). It's not a hard-and-fast rule, but it's part of, I guess, what lends fic toward not needing to rely on the canon actions of characters so much as the characters themselves.
Also, y'know, in all the explanations I've ever given for Clint/Coulson, I've almost never actually brought up the most obvious of "uptight and bespoke with snarky and rugged." Silly me.