Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-08 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2318 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2318 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

[Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)that should've been a reply to the original post
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Did Shakespeare write about any people alive in his time in sexually explicit situations? If so, yeah, I might side-eye him for that. Although there's also a bit of a gray area if you're talking satire, which traditionally can get away with certain things other forms of fiction can't, perhaps because satire is inherently disrespectful to begin with. Most pornographic fanfic really doesn't fall into that category, however.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 12:31 am (UTC)(link)As the anon above me pointed out, Shakespeare wrote SATIRE. Using SHAKESPEARE as an excuse for your mental illness? You're 12, aren't you?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 01:11 am (UTC)(link)Like I said above, rps fandoms differ in intensity, and believe it or not most shippers don't think any of it is ~real~; the delusional ones are just more vocal.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 01:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 01:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 01:59 am (UTC)(link)I don't think you know how to English oh wow.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 05:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 07:08 am (UTC)(link)Visp: RPFers are creepy shit.
You: Did you say something else is creepy shit?
Visp: No.
You: That doesn't answer my question.
Visp: I already did.
You: Clearly I'm failing to imply anything of value while I try to compare stalkers to Shakespeare, and pretend Shakespeare was incapable of creepiness. Because you are not engaging in my failosophical debate, I mean bait, ur meen.
You're a creep. Come to terms with that already.
DA
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 09:06 am (UTC)(link)Visp: RPFers are creepy.
Anon: Shakespeare wrote fiction about real people - is that creepy?
Visp: [doesn't really answer the question, just calls names. But I don't think that's anything new]
Anon: [spells same question out in small words - admittedly, not without being a tad insulting too]
Visp: [more insults]
You - or Backup Name Caller, BNC: [inaccurately summarises conversation]
Me: WTF? Does nobody distinguish between delusional RPSers and their theories and fictionalised biography? Christ, these people had better never, ever read half the books in my collection. I wonder, do they think Hans Fallada is a Bad Author too?
Re: DA
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-10 01:24 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 12:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 01:27 am (UTC)(link)actually, you're just making anti-rps look like complete assholes.
dda
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 02:21 am (UTC)(link)You're the one insisting that her behavior reflects on people who don't agree with you and using it to dismiss other arguments and users that have nothing to do with her.
Re: dda
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 05:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: dda
(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject