case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-25 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2335 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2335 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 095 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2013-05-26 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
One of the phrases they seem really hung up on in the modern versions is this notion that she is "The Woman" to Sherlock. Since it is (in their interpretation) intended to be a signifier of profound respect, they automatically assume that a dude professing profound respect for a woman has got to be in love with her, and arrggggghhhhh....

Moffat's 'but what's your problem - he does love her, so really, she wins in the end!' is a perfect example of catastrophically missing the point. I suppose the notion that of a woman defeating a man purely through intellect seems less ground-breaking and unsexy these days, but when you look at how female characters are actually portrayed versus how it seems they ought to be in our more egalitarian paradigm, it is still depressingly groundbreaking to have one do so.

Writer dudes? I've outsmarted many men in my life without fluttering my eyelashes. I get that this is fantasy for you, and that's how you'd like to think you were outsmarted, but it really probably wasn't. The average IQ of the average man and woman are virtually identical, so women almost certainly outsmart men as often as the reverse happens in real life all the time without needing to resort to "wiles". This isn't a pushup contest.