Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-25 04:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #2335 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2335 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 095 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And yes. YES YES YES. Dear God.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)But that doesn't make it any less true.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 21:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 01:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 13:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 21:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 00:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 02:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 01:02 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
Writers, stahp. Holmes had no canon love interest, why change his character for the sake of The Rule of Whatever? And why change Irene? If anything, this oversimplifies their relationship.
no subject
no subject
"It was not that he felt any emotion akin to love for Irene Adler."
That's not ambiguous. AT ALL.
And if you wanna argue against it on the grounds of "Watson wrote that, he could be wrong", well, 99% of the stories are written from Watson's POV; if you're going to dismiss this, you have to dismiss most of canon.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 21:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 22:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 23:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 08:24 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 22:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 23:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 23:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 00:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-26 00:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-25 23:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Also, I got no beef with shipping it. I just wish it were portrayed more often as Holmes pursuing her, or the one hopelessly pining :u
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-25 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 12:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 12:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Moffat's 'but what's your problem - he does love her, so really, she wins in the end!' is a perfect example of catastrophically missing the point. I suppose the notion that of a woman defeating a man purely through intellect seems less ground-breaking and unsexy these days, but when you look at how female characters are actually portrayed versus how it seems they ought to be in our more egalitarian paradigm, it is still depressingly groundbreaking to have one do so.
Writer dudes? I've outsmarted many men in my life without fluttering my eyelashes. I get that this is fantasy for you, and that's how you'd like to think you were outsmarted, but it really probably wasn't. The average IQ of the average man and woman are virtually identical, so women almost certainly outsmart men as often as the reverse happens in real life all the time without needing to resort to "wiles". This isn't a pushup contest.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 02:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-26 11:09 am (UTC)(link)