case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-01 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2342 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2342 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-01 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Just because it's called a classic doesn't mean it's any good. I prefer Jane Austen's books to any of the Bronte sisters' books.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-01 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
SA. Damn it - wrong thread!

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
dw i went to read this thread because i only read the threads of specific secrets, and i read the thread this was intended for instead of this one and was very confused. good to see someone else made the exact opposite mistake!
lyndis: (Default)

[personal profile] lyndis 2013-06-01 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I love Jane Austen. :)

Literature is a matter of taste always, and not everyone will find a "classic" book enjoyable to read.

For example, On the Road (Jack Keroauc) gets so much exclamation over it to this day, but I thought it was a shitty book cover to cover. I could appreciate some of the morals that CAN be drawn from the book, but I honestly don't feel like the author put them in there on purpose, or was trying to teach anything to anyone by writing the book. Mostly it just seemed like a story about a doormat following his shitty womanizing asshole friend around taking notes. If it had been written like a nature documentary I might have liked it better.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-06-01 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Mostly it just seemed like a story about a doormat following his shitty [...] asshole friend around taking notes

Sherlock Holmes ahoy!
lunabee34: (Default)

[personal profile] lunabee34 2013-06-02 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
I love your description of Kerouac. :) Made me giggle.

I feel pretty much the same way about most of the Beats; it's only when you widen out the circle to, say, Denise Levertov or Gregory Corso (who is fantastic), that I get interested in their writing. Mostly, they just seem super douchey to me (especially Kerouac and Burroughs ugh) which usually isn't a problem for me. I can usually separate my reaction to a work of fiction or art or whatever from my reaction to its creator but not so for the Beats for some reason.
(reply from suspended user)
cakemage: (STOP!  YOU VIOLATED THE LAW!)

[personal profile] cakemage 2013-06-02 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, thank heavens, someone who hates On the Road as much as I do. I even have "hating Jack Kerouac" as an lj/dw interest (along with a few others) because that book pissed me off so much.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
I couldn't even finish On The Road because it was just so incredibly bad. Glad I'm not the only one who thinks so.
writerserenyty: (Default)

[personal profile] writerserenyty 2013-06-01 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Love me some Austen <3 Went to the Jane Austen Center in Bath last year and I freaked out.

Though I'm boring and like Pride and Prejudice the best (though Northanger Abbey is my love).

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 10:30 am (UTC)(link)
Same here.