Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-06-22 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2363 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2363 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #337.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 01:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
A) Writers with more skill is key. There are some advanced tricks to writing that you need more skill to pull of credibly. First-person present tense is one. Using "orbs" to mean eyes is another.
B) Is it really a metaphor? Because it seems a little broken. With a metaphor there needs to be some frame of reference, but calling eyes "orbs" regardless of context is basically just substituting the word "orbs" for "eyes."
C) If one particular "metaphor" has been used by writers for a long time, that's as good a reason as any to stop.
D) Orbs for eyes. Just say no.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Words like orbs have been in use for years, and all of the sudden it's not okay for those still learning how to write to use them?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 01:34 am (UTC)(link)"Orbs" is just not part of common English vernacular these days. If you're writing a period piece, it might be appropriate, but for a story set in modern times, with characters who wouldn't use that word in speech or think it, or even know what it meant, it can be unnatural and stilted rather than clever. It usually reads as tired and unnecessarily purple instead of ~poetic~ or whatnot.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 02:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)Now, "orbs" certainly has been in use for years, but so has the line, "it was a dark and stormy night," and so has the convention of describing a character by having him/her look in a mirror. Cliches are cliches because they have been used for so long by so many people, and yes, they become annoying after a time if only because readers get sick of seeing them. Additionally, a reader may just not personally like the use of a particular descriptor or phrase, and that's okay.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 02:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject