case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-07-08 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2379 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2379 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #340.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-09 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
As the anon who is over the moon thanks to transcriptanon (don't have to ask people for the tricker secrets anymore!)

NO
It's not appropriation. At all.
For me it's a visual aid, for my utterly blind person it's an identifyer for other people, for some glasses are workwear and yes, for some people, it's fashion.

This is not bad. It helps bring prices down (last seasons frames if it's available for you! They can be free, then you're only paying for lenses. If you're lucky, country/state/town/store dependant)

Certainly not appropriation(?!), all they're doing is wearing some glasses. This is not inconveniencing or harming you. You could go on a similar rant about people who wear gloves for a purpose as opposed to people who wear it for fashion