case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-07-08 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2379 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2379 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #340.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-09 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
If you look at the criteria used for other things that are called appropriation? It absolutely is. But social justice is a popularity contest as much as anything else in the world, and unless you're literally blind, vision impairment is just way too mainstream for anyone to give a shit about it.

Yay for picking and choosing your extremist views on ~activism~!1!! (I wish I could still believe in my own attempts at making that look hyperbolic. An SJ-conscious friend of mine used to swear by Lady Gaga as her activist pop idol for years and years, and then one day she put on a mermaid costume with a closed tail during a performance and rolled herself onto the stage in a wheelchair, or something. And just like that, the love was over and Lady Gaga had joined the ranks of the ablist and appropriating enemy. ffs)