case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-07-21 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #2392 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2392 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
So anyone who has ever consumed any addictive substance deserves to die?

I'm just trying to be clear here on what you're saying. Because you think that addicts deserve to die, and you're also arguing that taking an addictive substance is morally the same as being addicted, because anyone who takes an addictive substance does so with the knowledge that they could become addicted.

So clearly, this would lead to the conclusion that anyone who's ever done hard drugs, or drank any alcohol, or smoked a cigarette, or had a cup of coffee deserves to die, because those are all addictive things, and they could have become addicts, and someone who makes a choice that could lead them to become an addict is morally the same as an addict, and addicts deserve death.

So just to be clear here, this is what you think, right?

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] poisonenvy 2013-07-21 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, heaven forbid someone try out gambling or having sex which are some pretty common, not substance related addictions.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Compulsive behaviors and addictions to chemical substances are not the same thing and trying to compare one to another is just stupid.

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] poisonenvy 2013-07-21 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
According to the DSM, pathological gambling is considered an addictive disorder.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, is an addiction, but it's still not the same as a substances that causes a physical need for it.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Gambling, sex, and risky behavior lead to an alteration in brain chemistry. These addicts are hooked on pleasurable chemicals their brain releases and in some cases become dependent on risky activities to get ANY feelings of pleasure. How is this not a physical need?
elephantinegrace: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] elephantinegrace 2013-07-21 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Apparently, people aren't allowed to make bad decisions without it making them bad people, forever.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-22 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
STRAWMAN ARGUMENT!

Not everyone in this thread are saying that addiction means that someone is a horrible person who deserves to die. They're saying that they are not blameless in their addiction.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
No, no at all.
They do deserve help and support, but they shouldn't be told "Oh, it's ok. That's an illness so it's not your fault at all".
Unless they were forced to start, they are the only responsible for their own actions and although their situations should be taken into account, that doesn't make them completely responsibility free for their actions.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Then stop talking bullshit about how people who die don't deserve sympathy or compassion if they were addicts. Thanks in advance.

Yes, I agree that they made mistakes, but they're still human beings, and it is still an illness. And human beings, even ones who make mistakes, deserve help, support, understanding, and sympathy. Not being told that it's wrong to feel sympathy for them if they die.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
And I never said anything like that, so please start reading the comments you're answering to before accusing someone of something they didn't say. Thanks in advance.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
NOBODY FUCKING SAID ADDICTS DESERVE TO DIE, STOP STRAWMANNING, YOU UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE MORON. All that was said was that addiction is PREVENTABLE, in a way other mental disorders are NOT, because the first step to addiction, i.e. beginning use of the addictive substance, IS A CHOICE MADE OF FREE WILL.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-21 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Didn't OP say that they don't have any sympathy for the person? Implying they do have sympathy for none-drug related death? Therefore they are literally saying that X deserves their death more than Y does?

Like that anon who says men deserve rape more than women? They're always coming in with "I didn't say they deserve it, just that they deserve but MORE than women." which is moronic logic.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-22 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Not everyone is the OP.

This conversation has moved WAY beyond just discussing the OP's original point or Cory's death. We're now talking about addiction in general.
diet_poison: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2013-07-22 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
Which, of course, was inevitable. May or may not have been OP's intention, but it was pretty much inevitable.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-07-22 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
We actually do not know addiction is preventable.

yes, addiction to hard drugs is preventable.

But, there is such a thing and "addictive personalities". So let's say he never got his hands on hard drugs. He might have just had an innocent drink and became an addict - while me, who does not have that genetic make-up, can get plastered a a party (I generally choose not to, but I could) without getting addicted.

So basically, had he never taken drugs, he might still have ended up an alcoholic and died similarly anyway....
diet_poison: (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2013-07-22 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
 photo Rapunzelcalmyotits_zpsffaa3243.gif
Edited 2013-07-22 03:13 (UTC)