[ SECRET POST #2408 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2408 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The story was bad. The dialogue was bad. The characters weren't exactly shining paragons of originality or, with few exceptions, well rounded. Objectively I'd say the movie is bad because of all these things and not at all deserving of all the hype.

Yes, this is precisely what I disagree with.

Using the sword as an example: from any logical perspective it doesn't make sense that they use it the way they do. But it's so cool, and the moment when it's first used is such an awesome, visceral kick, that I don't understand how you can use that as a serious objection. And it would not have been so awesome if they had set it up more. It is far less logical, but it is far more effective, and that is much more important.

And the rest of it, yes, the story was simplistic, the characters were deeply and profoundly unoriginal, but again, it was all incredibly effective, so I don't see how its bad. Those characteristics are usually the characteristics of bad movies, but they're not actually identical with being a bad movie. And in this case, they're not, because it is working on a different level. And because it is all done with so much joy and energy. And that's why it is deserving of the hype.

[(Anonymous)]

you sound pretty butthurt to refuse to accept someone can think a movie sucks but enjoy its suckiness

[(Anonymous)]

i'm glad you were able to pick up on the furious anger that was radiating out of every pore of my body when i was writing that post

[(Anonymous)]

you don't need to be capslocking and arguing in circles to make your annoyance obvious

trying to argue the subject in general is pointless because everyone has different tastes in what they enjoy

[(Anonymous)]

oh, okay, you're actually serious

i'm really, really not annoyed. i really liked pacific rim and i really enjoy talking about it and trying to get at what i liked about it, and that's what's going on here. sorry if i came across like i was annoyed.

i agree that everyone has different tastes than what they enjoy, the thing that i was responding to was that the OP of this thread seemed like the enjoyed the movie but didn't think it was good, which is an interesting position and one that i wanted to talk about in relation to the movie and the reasons i liked it, because, again, i liked the movie

i have no beef with people not liking it, which is why i didn't say anything to the original secret poster

i hope you enjoyed this apologia for my posts. in conclusion, i would like to say that pacific rim was rad, and giant monsters must be destroyed. thank you, and good night

[truxillogical]

I still hold that there's something original in Newt Geiszler being a nerd who actually speaks and acts like a nerd, instead of just Cardboard Hollywood Nerd Cutout.