Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-11 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2413 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2413 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #345.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-11 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)...a female Ramsay in that culture would have to be hellaciously effective to get away with breaking all the gender norms in addition to all the social norms/basic moral tenets male Ramsay already stomps all over, especially since I don't think female inheritance is the norm? Like, female Ramsay would have to do it backwards in high heels. I wouldn't like female Ramsay any more, but I'd be more impressed.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-11 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)/some/ stans? she'd have legions of stans & the woobification would be off the scale
no subject
But, damn, yeah I think I'd be impressed, but still would be horrified. There aren't a lot of female villains in the Ramsay spectrum so it'd be a nice trope breaker... she says using "nice" lightly.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-12 03:47 am (UTC)(link)