Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-08-26 06:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2428 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2428 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-27 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)Otoh, OT3s are a fantastic solution to the following problems:
1) You love canonical couple A/B but one or both of them has excellent tension with character C that you want to explore without breaking up A/B. (Examples that fit this pattern for me: Elizabeth/Peter/Neal, Hardison/Parker/Eliot, Pepper/Rhodey/Tony, Bruce/Pepper/Tony, Pepper/Natasha/Tony)
2) You ship the A/B/C dynamic more than you ship any individual pairing within that threesome. (Examples: Allison/Isaac/Scott, Duke/Audrey/Nathan, Jack/Elizabeth/Will, Jess/Jules/Joe [Bend It Like Beckham])
3) You don't particularly like canonical couple A/B, but you think it's more plausible for them to enter into a threesome with C than for them to break up and for A/C to get together instead. (Examples: Marcus/Cottia/Esca [The Eagle of the Ninth], Kirk/Spock/Uhura)
4) You ship both A/B and B/C, but choosing just one of those pairings would make you feel too bad for the character who's left out. (Example: Bucky/Natasha + Natasha/Steve)
5) Not a problem per se, but: The OT3 in question is canonical. (Examples: Various rare book fandoms that I won't list because they're embarrassingly small.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-08-27 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)But then, I tend to think superhero canons are basically incestuously interlinked bundles of people in highly stressful situations who need all the sex and friendship they can get. So, you know. There's that. [See also: my shipping habits in X-men comicsverse, DCU comicsverse and DCAU cartoon universe]