[ SECRET POST #2447 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2447 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 061 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think I had this confused with Young Indiana Jones in my head. I'm always a little leery of the 'famous character you love as a kid/teenager' premise. Mostly because teenagers are not my favourite age-set in fiction.

[(Anonymous)]

IIRC it was directed or produced by the same guy who did Young Indy, so your confusion may be warranted. And yeah, it pretty much thumbs its nose at Canon, but if you can hold your nose and suspend your disbelief, it's a fun ride.

Eh, you're the second one in this thread to say you don't like teenagers in fiction; I thought the characters were younger than that? IDK. I remember thinking teenagers were stupid when I was one, but now that I'm older, I'm...neutral? IDK. I wouldn't go out of my way to watch Hannah Montana or whatever, but I don't hate its existence or feel it's a curse upon the earth or anything.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I don't hate them. It's just that if I was given a choice between something centered on adult protagonists vs something centered on teens, I'd usually pick the former unless the latter threw a really tempting narrative my way.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT fair enough. I don't really watch movies (or even much TV) anymore, so I can't throw stones. Most of the adult fare these days is too immature for me personally, so. At least the kid/teen movies are supposed to be immature, so that's not so bad? IDK.

That said, I was of the age where I could have had wacky adventures with the characters, when I saw the movie. So. I'm wondering, like some of the other commenters, if it has held up.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I will agree on the immaturity of a lot of adult fare nowadays. Or, I'm not sure immaturity is quite the word, but the obsession with hyper-angst and drama? But most teen TV I've seen is the same or worse, so there's that. And the 'teen romance', 'teen comedy' and 'teen drama' categories are, um, not my favourite.

I think most of the younger cast shows/films I love are genre. Sci-fi, fantasy or adventure. Most of them have kids, though, rather than teens.

Wacky adventures are good, though. Hmm. Maybe I ought to try this one.

[(Anonymous)]

I've actually heard this movie referred to as Sherlock Holmes and the Temple of Doom.

[(Anonymous)]

LOL we have a winnah