Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-21 03:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2454 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2454 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)Like, OCs are just another way of enjoying the canon. People can make posts about how they want Leia and Luke to fuck in non-consensual ways but god forbid someone's thinking about how different characters may work in the same lore?
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)Fandom communities are generally understood by most to mean canon characters, no matter what ship or relation or combination you choose to stick them in. Posting an OC there is like going to a car enthusiast community and posting about the completely new car you just made up and built from scratch (but it uses the tail light of the brand everyone loves!!). Sure it's relevant in a way, but it's not what people are there for.
And like I said above, I say this as someone who loves OCs. I've never had a problem with people complaining to me about them, because I don't randomly talk about them where there's no interest and expect people to care.
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)But it's disingenuous to think that politeness norm, or like no one who has interest in OCs hasn't had some jerk come to them and remind them that all OCs suck or something.
Take this other thread for example http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/876886.html?thread=684870998#cmt684870998
where even if anons had something positive to say, they still felt like they had to preface their comments with "Some OCs suck!" or "I only like them if they're super well-written. It's like, yeah, we know that; it's like everything else. You don't have to give me the OC equivalent of 'no homo' in every OC thread.
I do think the OP could try to form an OC-specific community and be happier for it, but it's not really fair that OC can't be mentioned in general fandom comms.
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)I would say they have the full right to do that if the poster is posting in a place where OCs are not the focus. If people don't like your original homemade car with the Honda tail-lights that you posted in the Honda enthusiast community, you're already starting off on the foot of "what is this doing here?"
Some people are going to go "that's a nice car, but this isn't for originals" or "I'm only interested in originals if they're super well-built" because the poster started a more or less tangential thread. Yes, they know that, yes, the poster knows that; so why did the poster post that there?
Re: ITT: People missing the point
LOL. My parents are part of their local GWRRA Chapter. My dad even chaired the chapter for a few years. Custom jobs are common. Showing up with a bike from another company was acceptable. Until I had to sell my Yamaha, I got invites to their rides. I suspect the same is true of a fair number of vehicle fandoms where you have a healthy mix of restoration and customization.
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 02:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: ITT: People missing the point
Yes, because the last 40 years of Star Trek clubs built around roleplayed Starfleet, Klingon, and Romulan crews never really happened. (Good grief, who dropped the stupid bomb to redefine fandom = canon fanfic.)
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 12:18 am (UTC)(link)Some people don't even know fandom history but think they can dictate fandom spaces.
Re: ITT: People missing the point
example: http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/868288.html?thread=681164224#cmt681164224
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)I've BEEN in spaces for OCs. And they still get people barging in about how much OCs suck.
Re: ITT: People missing the point