Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-21 03:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2454 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2454 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)But I can get het anywhere. It's typically het that doesn't handle women in a way I prefer, though. So I tend to read f/f or m/m (or genderswap m/f where the women involved are very close to their canon male characterization). The only het ship I'm passionate about is Buffy/Spike and that's typically written with a dynamic that I'm more likely to find in m/m slash than I do in m/f het. (Buffy tops, btw.)
Not to mention that, in my experience? Straight guys aren't really bothered when female characters are written poorly or as One Trope Wonders. You know the type - the ones that are defined by the fact that they're female. That class, traits, personality, etc are all drilled down into the fact that they're The Chick. That bothers me though. It bothers me a whole fucking lot. I get badly written female characters all the damn time. I love and treasure het fic that does a good job with female characters but I don't come across a whole lot of it. And (just like with m/m or f/f) it tends to be full of the same tropes and dynamics that hound professional media. But at least m/m or f/f handles it in a slightly new way. With m/f, it's just more of the same.
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)Although, in many cases, I've seen a well-developed female character get pushed to the side in favor of an uninteresting two-dimensional male character in terms of shipping, and that makes me somewhat bitter.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 02:54 am (UTC)(link)I get all the Het I need in canon, really, more of it than I can handle.
I read fan fiction for the slash and the femslash because I'm wired to love them too and try finding that much in canon.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 04:47 am (UTC)(link)In fact, I won't read slash where one of the male characters is depicted as giving up his autonomy or is woobie-fied to the extent he has no freaking agency. It pisses me the fuck off every time (and bores me to tears.)
The whole reason I got into slash to begin with is for the equality of the partnership. That and the two cocks. (I do sometimes read femslash, but as I'm a straight woman, not as often.) But if they don't act like equals, I say fuck it and backbutton out of there.
Re: OP
I want equals that het does not often give. I also want less woobie and more IC (over-woobification counts as OOC).
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 06:28 am (UTC)(link)over-woobification counts as OOC
Right on. It boggles me that people enjoy reading stuff that's so OOC, but different strokes. Everyone gets something different out of fandom, which is why OP's post is so ridiculous.
And the OP makes assumptions about people finding het "gross" that are inaccurate as far as I'm concerned. I don't find it gross. I often find it offensive to myself politically, yes, or boring, and it pushes my sexism hotbuttons, and my resentment of the Establishment, but I don't find it repulsive.
I just prefer sticking it to the Man. Literarily-speaking.
Re: OP
And I have never subscribed to the "Het is gross!" idea, not even during my most strict slasher days. Just because I'm a straight woman does not mean I have to read het all the time.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 07:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 05:09 am (UTC)(link)You are ALL fine with One Trope Wonder boys, but because they're the default gender (male), that can't be the defining feature so you're fine with them just being hot and dull as dirt. Stop with your fucking sexism expecting the girls to rise to your impossible standards.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-23 03:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 12:35 am (UTC)(link)So your point is less a point and just something you've seen that is not necessarily true.
Re: OP
What are you, like sixteen?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-23 03:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)