fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2461 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2461 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Sorry. my bad. Maybe. Looks like I either misinterpreted what 'she' was saying, or there was some major backpedalling.

We're talking about real dolls, That person said if she was rich she'd just rent celebrities to her friends instead, I said "what the fuck" she comes back saying she just mean rent male celebrities like fassbender to 'Talk' to. Take from that what you will, but I still don't trust her.

Well, I guess you shouldn't give her your social security number then.

But seriously, what the fuck? Kaijunscendre might be one of the most rational people on F!S, and the fact that you don't trust her to answer your question...might be the most ridiculous thing I've heard all day. It also makes you look like a fool.

So. Take from that what you will.

I happen to not think a person who buys into MRA literature and then comes here to spout it is a rational person. I would say that I am significantly more rational than her.

who buys into MRA literature and then comes here to spout it is a rational person.

rational person
rational person
rational person

You got me anon. I am a horrible, horrible misogynistic baby seal punching man. Because I enjoyed a book (that I have not finished) and talked about it without exclamation points or calling anyone a neckbeard.

The jig is up F!S. I have been found out.

Edited 2013-09-28 23:47 (UTC)

Kaijinscendre, you are hereby charged with impersonating a rational person, spouting mistruths against the matriarchy, having a difficult to pronounce username, and growing more hair around the neck region than is allowed by protocol.

We find you guilty! Do you choose death... or exile?

You guys were awesome. Time to go into exile and become one with nature.

who buys into MRA literature and then comes here to spout it

You keep saying that. Links please?

I can provide. I said I was reading, "The War Against Boys" (hey the title intrigued me and it was in the New section of the library).

I am assuming this is the same anon who told me, "That sounds like bullshit MRA drivel. Put that fucking book in the fire right goddamned now. seriously. stop. you're better than this."

I responded, "How about you go kindly fuck off. :) Just because a book focuses on things boys suffer from, it doesn't mean it is MRA drivel." Because I am not going to stop reading a book because of someone like that. As a matter of fact, it makes me more likely to read the book out of spite (I was probably going to return the book unfinished, because I should be getting House of Leaves tomorrow).

Well, it is MRA drivel partly because the conclusion that public education is anti-male just isn't strongly supported, and there's a fair bit of gender essentialism behind the different learning styles argument. But that's largely from reading the primary research regarding gender differences in the American school system. Read it with a few grains of salt.

The 'learning styles' thing annoys the shit out of me because as I've heard them described, my learning style is the 'boy' kind.

NAYRT

The War Against Boys? Really? I'm kinda agreeing with anon a bit.

seriously?

you're going to get at someone for reading something that you disagree with, and not immediately chucking it into the flames because it's from a (admittedly awful, dumb, and wrong) political viewpoint you disagree with?

MRAs are stupid as fuck. that doesn't mean that reading something written by MRAs (or even agreeing with something they said) is a personal fault or something to be avoided at all costs. is that really what we're doing now? saying that it's morally unaccpetable to read things from people we disagree with?

Hey, book burning can never go wrong.

Can I just say it's totally possible to read something, enjoy it, and disagree with it entirely (or even just in part). In fact that's pretty much how you make informed opinions. It's also a good idea, when you identify with a particular "side", to know your enemy's argument.

I wish radfem anon would get a username so we can be archenemies. :C I have always wanted an archenemy.

NOOOOO. I WANT HER.

Look, she clearly hates me more. Though, I think you being an actual male (...I think) does give you more credence for being hated. We will just have to ask her next time she shows up.

I'm pretty sure there's enough hate to go around. Or maybe you can take turns being Enemy #1? Like Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, it's Noodly's turn, and Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, it's yours. Of course, that leaves Sunday free, so maybe she could take a day off or maybe you could have someone being an apprentice enemy so they get one day a week for the experience. ::volunteers::

I am sure radfem anon will show up again eventually. We can just ask her then. I gotta make a icon with a fedora.

[ SECRET POST #2461 ]

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

YOU GOT ME!

Re: YOU GOT ME!

Re: YOU GOT ME!

Re: YOU GOT ME!

Re: YOU GOT ME!

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

Re: Prostitution

WHAT

Re: WHAT

Re: WHAT

Re: WHAT