Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-18 06:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #2512 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2512 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-19 04:41 am (UTC)(link)Like, really? What's preventing Marvel from doing both. Or just giving women more agency/representation in their movies as a whole?
Also this train of thought is kinda shaky. Loki's known for being a female-fan-favourite, so it's probably best not to knock on stuff like that.
(Basically what I'm saying - why not both - marvel should include more female characters, as well as characters that females like).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-19 05:38 am (UTC)(link)Speaking as a non-comic reader, and therefore representative of a large market the studio obviously wants to tap for these films, I can't really think of an iconic Marvel female character that, unestablished, can be a feasible prospect for a solo project. Doesn't help that viewers seem increasingly wary of new franchises these days. They'll either have to work with what they have (Black Widow origin story? Somehow doesn't sound super inspiring) or introduce someone new in a future release and then give her a solo movie. So it could be... awhile.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-19 08:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-19 11:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Also, people always point to the failure of Elektra and Catwoman as to why there aren't female superhero movies, but that conveniently forgets all of the movies led by male superheroes (like the Green Lantern movie) that flopped. Hell, even the Incredible Hulk movies didn't do well the last two times they went for it, and still they tried twice and included the character in the Avengers. (Don't get me wrong, I love Ruffalo's Bruce/Hulk, and I'm glad he was there.) People want to see good movies. There are crap movies featuring male leads just as there are crap movies featuring female leads. It's just movies featuring male leads are the standard, so if one of them flops it is not looked at as representative of the genre as a whole.
But I agree with you that it is a rather self-fulfilling prophecy. The studio owners think people don't want to see female characters, and thus audiences are more wary of anything with a female character. I wish it weren't the case.
(Sorry for the TL; DR. As a female comic reader who loves both genders of characters and would like to see more movies with women in the lead, this is a topic I care about.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-19 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)Personally, I don't think it's impossible for a female-driven superhero film to succeed if it gets all the above conditions right. I'm just giving my thought on the likelihood of the studio(s) ever even attempting something like that, with all the effort and care that they should put into it. Which is fairly slim, realistically speaking. I'm still waiting for a Wonder Woman film; we know the character can carry a product because the TV show from the old days was fairly well-received. It boggles the mind that it's taken so long for them to now finally be considering it seriously.
As for the MCU... unfortunately I don't think a BW film can hope for much success. Part of it is the actress and part of it is the way they've written her up to now, as a character so intrinsically 'supportive' in nature. I think they should go with a new character. If Ant Man then why not Ms. Marvel? And again, non-comic reader but it seems what Marvel female characters I know (from pop culture osmosis) and am interested in seeing all belong to franchises Marvel doesn't have rights to.
no subject
Yeah, I figure they won't likely want to do the effort, but it saddens me, as there really is no reason why they shouldn't. It can be done, and done right. Wonder Woman's status is ridiculous. But, granted, I would totally prefer that they do it right than that they half-ass it, fail, and then blame "see, no one wants to see a female superhero, even an iconic one" for the failure.
I think there is a chance for a BW movie. James Bond movies are popular and the recent ones seem like totally something that could have Black Widow instead of James Bond and just need some tweaks to work. I am fine with a new character too. Captain Marvel (aka Carol Danvers, who is whom I was assuming you meant, as she was slightly changed and the new Miss Marvel has not debuted yet; see secret 13) would be awesome. And was, in fact, one of the characters I was thinking of when talking about this.
Out of curiosity, what Marvel characters were you thinking of, if you don't mind my asking? I'll admit, a lot of my favorites have ties to the X-Men, so they wouldn't be possible for Marvel at the moment. (Not that I trust Fox to do better considering how they butchered Emma Frost in XMFC.) I can come up with a handful, though. But as I am a comics fan and follow comics blogs, I'm not exactly sure who would be popular just through pop culture osmosis.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-20 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)A good BW movie could be something akin to the Salt movie or the Nikita series in tone. Not sure how well that would mesh with the current lineup, but maybe that could change after Winter Soldier. Natasha gets a lot of hate from fanboys, though, even F!S isn't uniformly kind to her, as this thread demonstrates. Seems like something Marvel would be leery about. I'd worry about them doing it, then seeing it bomb and drawing the conclusion that it isn't worth it.
Oh yes, I did mean Carol Danvers. I guess her identity has been revamped, huh? But that's a relatively recent change, so do you think they'd go with that version if she ever ends up in the MCU? Or would they go with the more iconic identity of Ms. Marvel, as she was known when she joined the Avengers?
X-Men characters definitely come to mind, and with its popularity in mainstream pop culture due to the previous films and the various cartoons, I think they would be a hit among non-comic fans. Though I suppose any X-Men film would necessarily be an ensemble piece unless your name is Wolverine, there are some great ladies in need of a day in the limelight. I'm... really appalled by the mess that was Jean Grey/Phoenix's treatment in X-Men 3, so that's the wrong I'd like to see rectified the most. And... do you know if Marvel has rights to Scarlet Witch? I seem to recall that they could and plan to use Quicksilver for some unclear legal reason.
(Also Fantastic Four! Guess a new movie is in the works but since Fox is still at the helm I'm not all that hopeful.)
no subject
Yes, Salt. Or Wanted, I believe? Nikita possibly too. Or Alias, perhaps? I think each franchise has its own tone. Thor was the most comedic and fantastical, while Captain America was the most "realistic", with Iron Man in the middle. I think BW could fit in that scale. Much more on the CA end of it. But, yes, people are not always universally fond of her. It isn't even just the fanboys. A lot of women complain about things like how potentially revealing her costume is (again, see this thread). I'd worry about them doing it, then seeing it bomb and drawing the conclusion that it isn't worth it. Yeah, I very much have that fear, with any movie led by a woman. It just needs to be done well and IDK that I trust TPTB to do that.
Yup. Starting in 2012, I believe? I don't know if they'd go for her as Ms. Marvel or Captain Marvel. The Captain one could possibly be more confusing, given both potential familiarity with Ms. Marvel and potential confusion with Captain America. But there is material to work with either way if they so chose. (Which I doubt, but...)
I agree with all of that. As far as Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch, that is who I was talking about with Pietro and Wanda above, sorry. They straddle the lines of both worlds, like in their title (or mostly centered on them) House of M which had effects in both the Avengers and X-Men worlds (mostly X-Men, but Hawkeye, for example, was really affected by it and got a solo title out of it). Marvel has the right to them because they were both Avengers. (They just can't mention that they are mutants or that their father was Magneto. So, uh, no origin story. :P ) X-Men has rights to them because of their ties there. (Although they are only choosing to use Quicksilver/Pietro for some stupid reason, considering the ties the twins have to each other.) So they are odd. And I love Wanda/Scarlet Witch, so I'm good with Avengers using them and hope they can get it to work.
(Yeah, I have hopes and fears of that. Just as I want the new X-Men movie to be good, but considering their history and how they have treated some of the women, IDK how much I want to raise my hopes.)