case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-25 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2519 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2519 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 049 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-26 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah but here's an audience of one whose biggest turnoff is bland perfection.
intrigueing: (Default)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2013-11-26 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
Ok c'mon. IA with the sentiment, but I don't think there's anyone on earth who will actually dislike a fic if it doesn't have at least one description of a character's most unattractive feature. This isn't like visual porn, where people have to suffer through generic barbie dolls. In written porn, the worst that would happen is that a fic that doesn't describe unattractive features would be a tiny bit less hot to those people who happen to enjoy those mentions.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-26 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, but if you're trying to hit those people's kinks, I guess you put it in. It really, really doesn't matter - if this porn doesn't turn your crank, just read different porn. This is surprisingly easy.