Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-10-23 12:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #291 ]
⌈ Secret Post #291 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

__________________________________________________
2.

__________________________________________________
3.

__________________________________________________
4.

__________________________________________________
5.

__________________________________________________
6.

__________________________________________________
7.

__________________________________________________
8.

__________________________________________________
9.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Posting for Shahni due to lack of computer and early due to class.
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 105 secrets from Secret Submission Post #042.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, October 24th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-10-23 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)I believe in the power of words, I also accept that some words can be used for harm, but I like to think that there is always the option of not using them if you can help it. Of course, others will say that this is one step away from censorship, that clear, concise language needn't be transformed into meaningless euphemisms for the sake of strict PC-ness, but as issues of race and discrimination tend to be case-specific and people's reactions are often influenced by emotions, it's kind of hard to remain that level-headed.
But I'm not here to conflate harmless language with decades of real oppression =) The point at hand is that I rather think the comparison is effective, simply because it is very narrow. As can be inferred by the tone of the secret, OP 7 likely does not go around saying 'faggot' because they do not believe it has the power to offend - on the contrary, they use the word for the expressed purpose of getting a rise out of other people. Clearly, this person accepts a priori the power of this word to cause harm -- they are no defender of free speech, just a mindless drama whore, cashing in on a sensitive issue to get attention. This similar attitude is is depicted in the example cited for comparison - even in a hypothetical situation, what reason would you have to flaunt the word 'nigger' around in a black community? The (hypothetical) person who does this also accepts the negative connotation of the word, and purposefully targets an audience that would be most affected by its use. This is how the narrowness of the example illustrates the similarity between the two cases, and highlights the extreme tackiness in OP 7's behavior.
Re: 7.
I myself would not use the word "faggot" in front of a gay male if he asked me not to, nor would I ever use the word "nigger". But I make it a point that I do not give words that 'should' be personally insulting to me any power, and it's a philosophy I openly sell to others (but I don't have a go at them if they don't buy it XD )
Re: 7.
(Anonymous) 2007-10-24 12:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: 7.
Yes, in this example, it is trolling in it's purest form. But the best way to deal with trolls is not to react to them - you're only feeding them. In this way it should not be 'condemned', but ignored or laughed at. OP 7 is clearly only doing it for the lulz, and it's this offended attitude that they're looking for - but from the phrasing I'd say that they've had experience, in that they've possibly come from a community like 4chan or somethingawful, where the use of the word faggot (and nigger) doesn't mean anything anymore, and then used it in an LJ fandom comm and started surprise!wank. I have seen this happen myself, and usually the person who started it will just end up laughing at everyone for thinking that their opinion actually matters to them. Which, from what I can gather, is exactly what OP 7 is saying (and is, unfortunately, how most internet arguments go.)